A ROYAL PEJORATIVE

OLD HAG BROUGHT OUT FOR SYMPATHY HIKE

A once-royal deposed pensioner makes dramatic plea on Zoom to aid and abet inveterate liar group as farce and fraudulent mass murder racket continues.

LED OUT TO SUPPORT CURRENT PLANDEMIC ADVANCEMENT

Masonic and Illuminati aids to the old woman prompted her to stay on message, when her plea for leniency over charges her husband and she were accused of, arising from their son’s exposé in low life activities, were leaked off mic.

CLEAR MASONIC AND ILLUMINATI SIGNATURES ON HEALTH AID

Back on message, her mumbled plea, over a Zoom call with sycophantic, so called health professionals, urged the country to think of all those zombies queuing for their first of several toxic jabs.

In a voice reminiscent of so many media psyop emotional pleas, to turn a nation-wide “Ahhh!” into full blooded support, her volume was turned up, emulating command and control in top gear:

“It is obviously difficult for people if they have never had a vaccine, because they ought to think about other people than themselves”

She went on to remark:

“It is not only here we have got the virus, but it is everywhere. It is a strange battle that everybody is fighting…”

Her compliant fellow Zoomers were keen to support her well scripted remarks and make many feel that what was proposed was as legit as it gets. She was then prompted to urge the nation, in some sort of out of place festive season speech to ‘Go for Jab, as your country expects no less of all of you than to comply to our plan‘. She was then prompted to say:

“It is remarkable how quickly the whole thing has, has been done, and so many people have had the vaccine already. So you have to keep up the good work.”

The habitual playbook of dragging out old queens to support present propaganda, is in many ways illustrative of the despair and frustration the present regime faces in not impressing the general public of its aims and true objectives.

Meanwhile, in the sleepy compliant West Country county of Somerset, MP William Rees Mogg, returning, according to anonymous sources, from a family holiday home in distant lands, denied any them and us approach to this ongoing deadly farce. Caught laid back on a far away beach, Rees Mogg, approached by a pre ordained and vetted ‘journalist’ asking sycophantic question of meaningless import, refused to comment. His parliamentary office, on the utterly meaningless interview, met inquiries with rage and accusations of unpatriotic support for a regime that is doing its best to slaughter the majority, under cover of supporting a totally unsupported NHS, due for privatisation later this year. The ongoing house arrest of the country was impressed to be unprecedentedly essential, unlike the travels of Rees Mogg and many other MPs, who, unlike the general populace, feel they have every right to ‘do their own thing’.

Several vox pop interviews now circulating on the Cesspool, otherwise known as social media, show that compliance has risen exponentially to the twin extensions of the lurgy, somnolence and couldn’t-give-a-fuckery. Both are seen to be spreading like wildfire, throughout the land, to the detriment of both sides to the argument.

In summary the old lady gets the last word and is quoted as saying:

“The jab didn’t hurt at all” 

The jury is now out as to whether she received an authentic jab of the toxic compound at all. The ‘couldn’t-give-a-fuckery’ crowd are presently busily involved in making left of centre moves to influence the jury’s decision.

We await further advances in this dangerous but riveting game.

When Social Media Are Our Censors

This is how we take them down

In the short history of social media, what started out as global interactive fora connecting us all through ‘friendships’, tweets and other mechanisms, has turned itself into a global censorship platform where only OfficialSpeak is condoned and promoted. Not part of the official narrative? – then “You’re banned!”

Without going into the depth of control and real time strangulation of not only decent debate but also any alternative views wishing to discuss, as most people like to do in any open and free society, the point has well and truly arrived at, where the terror of the truth being widely recognised is so great as to ban everything, mock everything and disrupt everything that is truth, threatening to become the reality. We are travelling at lightning speed into a dystopia no one wanted, some might say we are already deep within it, which would be hard to disagree with. So many so ignorant of what is happening. The rest too self centred and ill informed to even care.

Extinction is born out of this, and rightly so. However there are many who would dearly love to arrest this nihilist, blind adherent journey into night.

So confronting the poster boy of the greater plan – Covid-1984 – let us ask a few reasonable and apposite questions that frankly need to be answered before we can all wholeheartedly march in lockstep towards our oblivion.These reasonable questions must be asked before any semi intelligent person concedes to operate under any authority’s diktats. Of course many recognise that the authorities imposing these diktats, are themselves the very epitome of illegal and unlawful imposition. Let us for now put that to one side and simply ask these questions. These questions must by necessity be answered fully, factually and with material evidence, otherwise there is no reason or just cause to ban people from asking such normal questions, unless of course the agenda is to avoid, strike down and ban free speech and cognitive initiative. I shall leave to reader to decide that outcome:

Here are some of them:

  • 1. Evidence that masks prevent infection.
  • 2. Evidence that masks don’t cause oxygen deprivation which can lead to seizures.
  • 3. Evidence that breathing in your own carbon dioxide does not cause bacterial infections and respiratory disorders.
  • 4. Evidence that wearing masks does not cause stress and anxiety.
  • 5. Evidence that wearing masks prevented the spread of the Spanish Flu.
  • 6. Evidence that dismissal for not wearing a mask at work would not represent a material breach of the Equality Act, which entitles someone to claim compensation for discrimination, as well as unfair dismissal.
  • 7. Evidence that the government lurgy has ever been proven to exist.
  • 8. Evidence that the Coronavirus Act and the regulations which arose out of it are not adjudged to be repugnant and void under the common law.
  • 9. Evidence that it is not a crime ancillary to genocide to collaborate with government policy, which has already resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths in care homes and hospitals.
  • 10. Evidence that the government has not relied upon fraudulent data to frighten the population into fearful compliance with its legally unenforceable diktats.
  • 11. Evidence that vaccines are 100% safe to administer.
  • 12. Evidence that vaccines do not have any detrimental health effects, amongst which are, but not limited to,  neurological, physical impairment, paralysis, long lasting and detrimental side effects and/or death.
  • 13. Evidence that vaccines have been thoroughly tested according to the full rigours of historic testing procedures (usually lasting years) and do not fall short in any respect, of these essential processes .
  • 14. Evidence that vaccines have been able to halt /prevent the conditions they are allegedly created for.
  • 15. Evidence that keeping a safe distance(6ft/2m) apart is foolproof in stopping spread of infection from alleged Covid-19
  • 16. Evidence that a crowd of 2 people gathering is safer than a crowd of 3 or more people gathering in terms of preventing spread of an alleged pandemic Covid.
  • 17. Evidence that interacting with people in public and/or open spaces causes a health threat .

If anyone finds these questions and similar are a step too far or out of order then surely the nature of freedom of speech, holding alleged authority to the fire, wishing to have absolute evidence before commitment, is now against the best processes of life. That it is against the law can be mooted, yet the response must be against what law. Most likely responses to that are in the vein –

“Do not challenge what we say – just do it! What we say you must do” – which of course we all know is the mark of totalitarian authority.

QED – Zero Freedom!!

If, as with what they constantly bombard us, the very questioning of their almighty BS is a public health hazard, then surely we are dealing with utter nutcases, professional psychopaths, authoritarian followers and mere puppets of even greater species of the same. By that token alone every single member of the public ought to be rising up and saying a huge NO!

Sadly we have the majority of our country who have rolled over, unquestioning to these masters of lies, propaganda and mind control. If we were to recoil several decades and place this position into an invasion by the Nazis successfully taken, then we should see the very sinew of the population rolling over and creating a British Vichy. Most people will not know what the heck I refer to as all of that has been either expunged or not told to present generations. Their Me! Me! Me! desires have all been met. They give not one flying one for anybody but themselves. Their parents have, in the majority, had few decent critical brain cells to hand down, so we surely are dealing with a manifest pen of sheep.

Even so, against the odds, the minority always win through, so asking these reasonably presented questions is paramount.

The upside of all this is that it is these very questions that can be targeted, not only to those who try to impose governance on us but also to every single head of every single entity that colludes with the lies that the questions expose. It is for each and everyone of us who cherish truth, wish to retain the freedoms we believe and acknowledge are our natural given right. The payback is in what results from this exercise and that down the line is the extinction of those that follow the losers.

Every single supermarket, shop and trading establishment, every single employer who demands you obey, every single law enforcer, bully boy who demands you do this and that. Every single fine you may receive. Every single diktat coming from wherever needs facing off, lettering with the Letter Protocols we have for just this. Every travel quisling, every airline, every airport, port authority imposing whatever. Every pub that goes along every restaurant, every eatery, every one who says – DO IT BECAUSE YOU HAVE BEEN TOLD TO.

When people take back their power of NO! then change will transpire.

For now we have a powerful action prosecuted by the People’s Union of Britain – that is, by the way, you! – so join the PUB that is bringing the case against all this fraud – make it personal – make it you who is taking these criminals down!

So never ask what your country can do for you but ask what you can do for your people! The People of Britain

THE RALLYING CRY OF THE PEOPLE

No one, not even Social Media, will ever crush the voice of the people. Best way is to withdraw all support from these cancerous organs, yet the will of many is so weak and insecure it relates drawing off/leaving any social medium, as running from friends. Therein is the rub, the utter abrogation of taking personal 100% responsibility and action, the sheer intellectual inability to separate virtual from reality.

Still, all this we know. What those that continue to inflict on us do not know is the power of the pen over their overarching totalitarianism they wish to lock us down into. Pens as swords to the ready and let us launch an attack like they never have witnessed.

**PLEASE SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON EVERY SOCIAL MEDIUM YOU HAVE, SO AS TO SEE HOW THEY TREAT THESE QUESTIONS. WHEN ON A WAR FOOTING WE HAVE TO CHALLENGE IN EVERY WAY. THIS IS DIRECT CHALLENGE FOR A CONVERSATION AND FOR THE DEPTH OF CENSORSHIP WE MAY ENCOUNTER! TEASE ‘EM, TICKLE ‘EM AND ULTIMATELY DEFEAT THEM**

===================
About the Author

Jonathan L. Trapman

Author and photographer writing since age 9, photographing since age 10. A professional career as photojournalist, working for top titles in Fleet Street (London Times, Daily Express and very short, boring stint with the Sun newspaper) swiftly exposes him to propaganda and half truths demanded from photo/journalists of the ‘70s and 80s.

Deciding his soul to be worth more than shekels earned from the news rooms of corporate cronyism, went on to  become one of the industry’s foremost photographers. Enjoyed getting to know the world, its peoples and a far wider vision of life on earth on others’ behalf and at others’ expense. Appeared on TV and radio including BBC, France Inter and online radio.

Invited to speak at creative and literary conferences across the globe having in early 2012, in partnership with his wife, accomplished the first ever English translation, in over 900 years, of 11th century Sufi founder and mystic saint Hoja Ahmed Yassawi’s Diwani Hikmet (Divine Wisdom) poetry and sacred verse. Currently working on a 7 volume opus The Freedom Cycle, Dreams and Realities being the first, now published. www.thefreedomcycle.com
The Freedom Cycle is also the info hub for the People’s Union of Britain’s private criminal prosecutions against the array of main players in the present criminal farce.

highlylikelynews-512

GUEST AUTHORS

Views expressed by Guest Authors are their own, and are not reflective of HLN or its editorial team. HLN publishes these for research and educational purposes only. The text is presented for these reasons alone, and absolutely not for purposes related to promoting any of the views expressed herein


HANCOCK, WHITTY, FERGUSON AND VALLANCE SERVED NOTICE OF PRIVATE PROSECUTION FOR FRAUD

It has taken a while, yet the tightest private criminal prosecution for what will turn out to be the biggest case of criminal fraud perpetrated has the clock set in motion.

On the 21st February 2021 at 21.02.21 these four criminals were put on notice for crimes so heinous, so diabolical that the next little while the whole of the nation will be awoken to the fraud perpetrated on them case after case in the High Court. Here they will face a jury of 12 and try and extricate themselves from the charge of fruad, treason, genocide and mass murder.

It is expected to blow up the whole alleged fraud perpetrated by non disclosure of salient facts known to all four. Wrose their connection and blood money they took from the Gates Foundation foryears leading up to this criminality will point fingers at the very core of a cabal intent for decades in exterminating the majority of the planet in the cause of Agenda 21/30.

In spite of the many thousands already murdered in this fraud, it will be revealed how it all could have been prevented, if it were not for the high profits to be made.

Here below is the complete notice served the four:

R [PEOPLE’S UNION OF BRITAIN] [PROSECUTION]
VMATT HANCOCK, SECRETARY OF STATE FOR DHSC [1ST DEFENDANT]
CHRIS WHITTY, CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER [2ND DEFENDANT]
PATRICK VALLANCE, CHIEF SCIENTIFIC OFFICER [3RD DEFENDANT]
NEIL FERGUSON, IMPERIAL COLLEGE [4TH DEFENDANT]


FAO: MATT HANCOCK, CHRIS WHITTY, PATRICK VALLANCE & NEIL FERGUSONServed by email at 21:02:21 on 21/02/21.NOTICE OF INTENDED PRIVATE CRIMINAL PROSECUTION
Dear Sirs,

RE: R [PUB] v HANCOCK & OTHERS [2021]You are hereby served NOTICE OF INTENDED PRIVATE CRIMINAL PROSECUTION, in relation to the following charges of fraud by false representation and non-disclosure, pertaining to the statements you and the other defendants made, regarding the purported ‘COVID-19 Pandemic’.

SUMMARY OF CHARGES AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS

FRAUD BY FALSE REPRESENTATION

For all the elements of fraud by false representation to be in place, under section 2 of the Fraud Act 2006, the following must be proven:

a. Party A knowingly relied upon a false statement.
b. Party B was caused by Part A to rely on that false statement.
c. Party A did so with the intent of causing losses to Party B or for the purposes of procuring material gain.

Upon the evidence, the prosecution alleges that the defendants have knowingly relied and caused Parliament and the British People to rely upon multiple false statements during the ‘COVID-19 Pandemic’, with the intent of securing the maximisation of UK ‘vaccination’ uptake, as well as past and future material gains.
a (i) You knowingly and falsely claimed that COVID-19 [SARS-CoV-2] is “the most serious public health threat since the 1918 H1N1 influenza pandemic”.

(ii) Upon the evidence, the prosecution alleges that statement is plainly false because expert witness testimony and FOI requests show that neither SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19 have ever been empirically proven to exist and therefore cannot be the cause of a genuine pandemic.

b (i) You knowingly and falsely claimed that “without the social distancing of the entire population, home isolation of cases and household quarantine of their family members”, 510,000 British people would die from COVID-19.

(ii) Upon the evidence, the prosecution alleges that it is an indisputable matter of fact that this prediction has been mathematically proven to be false by the expert witness testimony adduced in this case.

c (i) You knowingly and falsely claimed that the UK Government’s COVID-19 policies “…will need to be maintained until a vaccine becomes available”.

(ii) Upon the evidence, the prosecution alleges that this statement is demonstrably false, on the ground that an obviously viable alternative was treating the unproven Coronavirus in accordance with pre-existing public policy, without adopting any of the lockdown policies imposed, thereby avoiding the unconscionable suspension of civil liberties and devastating financial losses the taxpayer.

All of these false statements are contained in the summary of the Imperial College Model, written and published by the 4th defendant on 16/03/2020, on the Imperial College website. However, additional evidence shows that the defendants began relying upon the erroneous computer-generated data on or before 01/03/2020, when the COVID-19 Battle Plan was announced by the 1st defendant and quickly implemented by the UK Government, without public scrutiny or meaningful parliamentary debate.

It is alleged that, in causing both Parliament and the British People to rely upon these plainly false statements, the defendants acted dishonestly, knowingly conspiring to maximise ‘vaccination’ uptake in the UK, whatever the cost, in order to secure past and future material gains.Thereby causing public sector borrowings, charged to the UK taxpayer, to rise to 100.8% of UK GDP [as of 20/11/2020]; and the house arrest of the entire population, which was all done by government diktats, each of which was founded on the plainly dishonest statements contained in the 4th defendant’s fraudulent Imperial College Model, which was funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [which, for the sake of brevity, we will refer to as the Gates Foundation].Since there are public records which reveal the material gains secured by the defendants’ mutual commitments and contributions to the maximisation of ‘vaccination’ in the UK [and the rest of the world], the prima facie and circumstantial evidence in support of these serious allegations amply demonstrates that all the elements of section 2 fraud by false representation are in place and that the defendants should be indicted as charged.
FRAUD BY NON-DISCLOSURE
For all the elements of fraud by non-disclosure to be in place, under section 3 of the Fraud Act 2006, the following must be proven:
a. Party A failed to disclose certain information to Party B.
b. Party A was under a legal duty to disclose that information to Party B.
c. Party A did so dishonestly, intending, by that failure, to make a gain or cause a loss.

Upon the evidence, the prosecution alleges that the defendants knowingly failed to disclose information you had legal obligations to disclose to both Parliament and the British People, with the intent of maximising ‘vaccination’ uptake in the UK, in order to secure past and future material gains, at the devastating cost of civil liberties and the solvency of the nation.

a. You knowingly failed to disclose that the so called science and data relied upon by the World Health Organisation [WHO], in declaring SARS-CoV-2 to be a worldwide ‘pandemic’ on 11/03/2020, was none other than the discredited Imperial College Model.

b. You knowingly failed to disclose that SARS-CoV-2 was no longer classified as a High Consequence Infectious Disease on 13//03/2020 – before the 1st defendant presented and commended the Coronavirus Bill 2020 to the House of Commons, on the 19th and 23rd of March 2020, respectively.

c. You knowingly failed to disclose that the supposed latest science and data you relied upon to justify a declaration of a Public Health Emergency was Neil Ferguson’s unscientific Imperial College Model; and that it was known by 24/03/2020 at the latest that said model had been wholly discredited, when the New Scientist published the 4th defendant’s admission, before the Parliamentary Committee on Science and Technology, that he had reduced his prediction of 510,000 UK COVID deaths to 20,000, in the event his proposed lockdown policies were not imposed in the UK.


d. You knowingly failed to disclose that the executive agency the 1st defendant controls, Public Health England [PHE], received $500,000 from the US Government to “fast-track the COVID vaccine”, on or around 19/03/2020.

e. You knowingly failed to disclose that multiple WHO approved flu ‘vaccines’ are known to cause fatal adverse events in 377 out of every 100,000 healthy adults injected, whilst ‘influenza’ normally kills around 388 per year. [The ingredients in every UK licensed COVID ‘vaccine’ are believed to be very similar to these 2019-21 mRNA spiked flu ‘vaccines’, in which case they will have comparable mortality rates.]

f. You knowingly failed to disclose that none of the 2019-21 flu and COVID jabs are actually vaccines [they are mRNA treatments or gene therapies], which lays open the floodgates to future civil proceedings for misrepresentation, fraud and damages [irrespective of the purported indemnity granted to ‘vaccine’ companies and those who administer their products in the Coronavirus Act 2020].

g. You knowingly failed to disclose that there is a direct mathematical correlation between the 2020-21 flu and COVID ‘vaccine’ roll-outs in the UK and the deaths which the defendants claim to be COVID deaths during the same period.

h. You knowingly and dishonestly failed to disclose this information, when you had legal obligation to disclose it to Parliament and the British public, and you did so in service of the maximisation of ‘vaccination’ uptake in the UK and the rest of the world, for the purposes of securing their own material gains and those of their accomplices, knowing that the cost to the British People and the economy would be catastrophic.

i. You had a legal obligation to disclose these facts to the British People, on the ground that the 1st defendant, upon the advice of the 2nd, 3rd and 4th defendants, pledged on 01/03/2020, in the UK Government’s COVID-19 Battle Plan, that: “Public safety is our top priority.”The prosecution alleges that, had public safety been the defendants’ top priority, all of the foregoing information would have been disclosed to both Parliament and the British People, as soon as the information became available.

Moreover, in the mind of any reasonable person, knowing this information is essential to understanding that the entirety of the justifications given for declaring a Public Health Emergency were and remain founded on a series of profoundly dishonest statements, which have been relied upon by the defendants.

It naturally follows that the public disclosure of the information described, by either the 1st, 2nd or 3rd defendant at the UK Government’s daily press briefing, on or before 24/03/2020, would have been tantamount to a confession that there was no justifiable cause to declare a Public Health Emergency.Furthermore, the public disclosure of 8 e could and should have resulted in the suspension of the National Influenza Immunisation Programme and a thorough investigation of the allegedly lethal WHO approved mRNA spiked flu ‘vaccines’, which are considered all too similar to the substance of the COVID jabs subsequently licensed by the UK Government for mass administration.

However, it naturally follows that, without a ‘Public Health Emergency’, it would not have been possible for the defendants to cause the lockdown of the nation “until a vaccine is found”, with the fatally flawed advice you gave in your official capacities as Secretary of State for Health & Social Care, Chief Medical Officer, Chief Scientific Officer and the WHO and UK Government’s Senior Scientific Advisor on Pandemic Preparedness, Policy and Response.

The data-based evidence adduced by the prosecution also shows that, on the balance of probabilities, the vast majority of the deaths recorded as COVID deaths since September 2020, were, in reality, fatal adverse events, caused by the 2020-21 WHO and UK Government approved flu and COVID shots, in addition to those who died at home, in care homes and hospitals, who were denied palliative care “to save the NHS” from and “flatten the curve” of a ‘virus’ which has never been proven to exist.

Upon the evidence, the defendants committed section 3 fraud by non-disclosure, under the provisions of the Fraud Act 2006, on the basis that you knowingly and dishonestly failed to disclose information you had legal obligations to disclose to both Parliament and the British People, which you could and should have done in the House of Commons, as well as during the UK Government’s media briefings, at various times from 01/03/2020 to the present day, when you had ample opportunities to make public safety their top priority by fully availing Parliament and the British People of the latest science and data, as you repeatedly pledged to do, without ever actually delivering it.
Since there are public records which reveal the material gains secured by the defendants’ mutual commitments and contributions to the maximisation of ‘vaccination’ in the UK [and the rest of the world], the prima facie and circumstantial evidence relied upon in support of these criminal allegations amply demonstrates that all the elements of section 3 fraud by non-disclosure are in place and that the defendants should be indicted as charged.

URGENT APPLICATIONS BEFORE THE COURT

Given the unbridled seriousness of the allegations made, the prosecution is applying for summonses to be issued against the defendants without delay, to have you appear before a senior judge to plead and for the case is listed to be heard by a jury at the earliest opportunity.
A second application seeks a declaration, under the inherent jurisdiction of the court to act in the name of justice, that:
a. Upon the prima facie evidence adduced and in accordance with the opinion of Lord Sumption that the Coronavirus Act 2020 is constitutionally unlawful and therefore void and unenforceable, it is declared that, in the interests of providing finality to the families of those who are recorded as having died from or with COVID-19 and for the purposes of providing evidence in R [PUB] v Matt Hancock & Others, autopsies must be carried out and death certificates certified as if the 2020 Act had not been enacted.
b. For a period of at least 90 days, all flu and COVID ‘vaccinations’ are suspended, pending further criminal investigations into the allegation that the treatments concerned kill a minimum of 377 out of every 100,000 healthy adults injected.

For the avoidance of doubt, these proceedings are being brought in the absence of parliamentary, police or parliamentary intervention, without ill will, frivolity, vexation or malice, under the protection of the Treaty of Universal Community Trust.

In sincerity and honour,

Trustees of the People’s Union of Britain
All Rights Reserved – Errors & Omissions Excepted