When Bookies Refuse to Take the Wager You Know You’ve Won

Around 18 months ago you could walk into a bookie shop and lay a bet on Matt Hancock being kicked out of his Parliamentary position, with good odds. Luckily few people saw the opportunity and were able to save their pants.

You most probably could have laid odds on the number of deaths by Covid-1984 and made a bit or lost on the numbers game. If you had laid a bet on the likelihood of all this turning out to be one huge pandemic fraud, I am confidentially told that there would have been at least one big name bookie shop that would have given you very reasonable odds.

Sadly I do not have the facts to provide whether there are any ticket holders for that. However I can reveal that many have been going to the bookies and asking to lay bets on the likelihood that Matt Hancock, Chris Whitty, Patrick Valance and Neil Ferguson would be arrested before July.

To add my name to the list I entered my local Betfair and asked to be given the odds of these Four Horsemen of the Covid Apocalypse being sent down by September. The lady who I laid my enquiry skidded off to ask the manager what odds. I could see his face frown and nod a No.

In spite of the mask rules on offer, not taken by yours truly, of course, I sidled up and asked precisely why there was no trade on this one.

He grinned and admitted – “You gotta be joking, they’re a gonna. Everyone knows they are guilty as hell. We’d have to offer such dismal odds to be worthless.”

I smiled also to hear such truth and admission. I handed him a sticky from the Pandemic Fraud campaign and he nodded and said a huge thanks, as he took it with glee.

Prior to this visit I had purchased some much needed health stuff at Holland and Barrett. The lad behind the counter had admitted he thought it was all dodgy from way back, as I mourned the fact that him and his ilk did not feel brave enough to stand up and show their true colours. He also took a sticky and was grateful for the few minutes of information I poured in his direction. I left certain he would make use of the QR code and web address.

In the space of ten minutes I felt I had illumined several minds, though late, but closet minds opening are minds opening.

I also realised that this is the time that is the most important of all. Our endeavour to release the truth is no more important than right now. There are cracks all over this charade, this lunatic criminality. The harder we impress on others now, the easier the whole boatload will drown.

It is also to note of significance. It has been a mere week (discounting Easter) that the evidence bundle and case has been laid in court for due process to take its place – a week! Yet here we are at the point where the case is to be listed – in other words the summons will be served. For those that know about timing, process and the passage of these things this is supersonic. Some ask why – the answer is that there are far more people who refuse to buy the BS, the propaganda they spew out at us, and their assitance behind the cloak of the judiciary is huge.

The People will win, are winning – so join the People’s Union of Britain and become one of the prosecuting team, automatically!

=====================

Full story here – www.thefreedomcycle.com

P.U.B – www.thefreedomcycle.com/pub

Noose Tightens, Smell the Victory!

BREAKING NEWS FROM People’s Union of Britain


We have just received confirmation that the case files in the P.U.B. prosecution of the four horsemen of the Covid Apocalypse, are with the court’s listing department, who expect a hearing will soon be listed, following checks by the legal team at Bromley Magistrates, to which it was transferred for processing and listing by the Westminster court.

Being moved to the court which deals with all PCPs (Private Criminal Prosecutions), it is anticipated the fireworks will start going off very soon.

From the very start of this extraordinary case, it was always known to have taken a goodly time in getting to its present position. The major fraud case against both the mortgage and banksters took nearly 10 years to get this far, so looking at 10 months down the line we know, not only the case is rock solid but als that there are a huge swathe of the legal system behind us and making swift passage for the case of the centuries. This will be the single biggest legal case in the history of the British Isles.

There are many side cases going on yet this one in the High Court, probably the Old Bailey, the Common Law court of the Land due to a jury of 12 good men and women true, will be the show stopper of all showstoppers. The brilliant point is that its huge impact will force by every rule book the BBC, ITV, SKY and others to report truth for the first time in decades. It will destroy the curtain they have used to cover up so much criminality.

There is a squiddling’s chance of the judge being nobbled in the High Court, unlike the lower civil court that is rampant and built on criminal practices.

So ramp up your seat, buy in the popcorn and prepare for the best seats in the house to deliver day by day entertainment of exposure you have all longed for for too long!

=====================

A fuller update will appear in a day or so!

HANCOCK, WHITTY, FERGUSON AND VALLANCE SERVED NOTICE OF PRIVATE PROSECUTION FOR FRAUD

It has taken a while, yet the tightest private criminal prosecution for what will turn out to be the biggest case of criminal fraud perpetrated has the clock set in motion.

On the 21st February 2021 at 21.02.21 these four criminals were put on notice for crimes so heinous, so diabolical that the next little while the whole of the nation will be awoken to the fraud perpetrated on them case after case in the High Court. Here they will face a jury of 12 and try and extricate themselves from the charge of fruad, treason, genocide and mass murder.

It is expected to blow up the whole alleged fraud perpetrated by non disclosure of salient facts known to all four. Wrose their connection and blood money they took from the Gates Foundation foryears leading up to this criminality will point fingers at the very core of a cabal intent for decades in exterminating the majority of the planet in the cause of Agenda 21/30.

In spite of the many thousands already murdered in this fraud, it will be revealed how it all could have been prevented, if it were not for the high profits to be made.

Here below is the complete notice served the four:

R [PEOPLE’S UNION OF BRITAIN] [PROSECUTION]
VMATT HANCOCK, SECRETARY OF STATE FOR DHSC [1ST DEFENDANT]
CHRIS WHITTY, CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER [2ND DEFENDANT]
PATRICK VALLANCE, CHIEF SCIENTIFIC OFFICER [3RD DEFENDANT]
NEIL FERGUSON, IMPERIAL COLLEGE [4TH DEFENDANT]


FAO: MATT HANCOCK, CHRIS WHITTY, PATRICK VALLANCE & NEIL FERGUSONServed by email at 21:02:21 on 21/02/21.NOTICE OF INTENDED PRIVATE CRIMINAL PROSECUTION
Dear Sirs,

RE: R [PUB] v HANCOCK & OTHERS [2021]You are hereby served NOTICE OF INTENDED PRIVATE CRIMINAL PROSECUTION, in relation to the following charges of fraud by false representation and non-disclosure, pertaining to the statements you and the other defendants made, regarding the purported ‘COVID-19 Pandemic’.

SUMMARY OF CHARGES AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS

FRAUD BY FALSE REPRESENTATION

For all the elements of fraud by false representation to be in place, under section 2 of the Fraud Act 2006, the following must be proven:

a. Party A knowingly relied upon a false statement.
b. Party B was caused by Part A to rely on that false statement.
c. Party A did so with the intent of causing losses to Party B or for the purposes of procuring material gain.

Upon the evidence, the prosecution alleges that the defendants have knowingly relied and caused Parliament and the British People to rely upon multiple false statements during the ‘COVID-19 Pandemic’, with the intent of securing the maximisation of UK ‘vaccination’ uptake, as well as past and future material gains.
a (i) You knowingly and falsely claimed that COVID-19 [SARS-CoV-2] is “the most serious public health threat since the 1918 H1N1 influenza pandemic”.

(ii) Upon the evidence, the prosecution alleges that statement is plainly false because expert witness testimony and FOI requests show that neither SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19 have ever been empirically proven to exist and therefore cannot be the cause of a genuine pandemic.

b (i) You knowingly and falsely claimed that “without the social distancing of the entire population, home isolation of cases and household quarantine of their family members”, 510,000 British people would die from COVID-19.

(ii) Upon the evidence, the prosecution alleges that it is an indisputable matter of fact that this prediction has been mathematically proven to be false by the expert witness testimony adduced in this case.

c (i) You knowingly and falsely claimed that the UK Government’s COVID-19 policies “…will need to be maintained until a vaccine becomes available”.

(ii) Upon the evidence, the prosecution alleges that this statement is demonstrably false, on the ground that an obviously viable alternative was treating the unproven Coronavirus in accordance with pre-existing public policy, without adopting any of the lockdown policies imposed, thereby avoiding the unconscionable suspension of civil liberties and devastating financial losses the taxpayer.

All of these false statements are contained in the summary of the Imperial College Model, written and published by the 4th defendant on 16/03/2020, on the Imperial College website. However, additional evidence shows that the defendants began relying upon the erroneous computer-generated data on or before 01/03/2020, when the COVID-19 Battle Plan was announced by the 1st defendant and quickly implemented by the UK Government, without public scrutiny or meaningful parliamentary debate.

It is alleged that, in causing both Parliament and the British People to rely upon these plainly false statements, the defendants acted dishonestly, knowingly conspiring to maximise ‘vaccination’ uptake in the UK, whatever the cost, in order to secure past and future material gains.Thereby causing public sector borrowings, charged to the UK taxpayer, to rise to 100.8% of UK GDP [as of 20/11/2020]; and the house arrest of the entire population, which was all done by government diktats, each of which was founded on the plainly dishonest statements contained in the 4th defendant’s fraudulent Imperial College Model, which was funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [which, for the sake of brevity, we will refer to as the Gates Foundation].Since there are public records which reveal the material gains secured by the defendants’ mutual commitments and contributions to the maximisation of ‘vaccination’ in the UK [and the rest of the world], the prima facie and circumstantial evidence in support of these serious allegations amply demonstrates that all the elements of section 2 fraud by false representation are in place and that the defendants should be indicted as charged.
FRAUD BY NON-DISCLOSURE
For all the elements of fraud by non-disclosure to be in place, under section 3 of the Fraud Act 2006, the following must be proven:
a. Party A failed to disclose certain information to Party B.
b. Party A was under a legal duty to disclose that information to Party B.
c. Party A did so dishonestly, intending, by that failure, to make a gain or cause a loss.

Upon the evidence, the prosecution alleges that the defendants knowingly failed to disclose information you had legal obligations to disclose to both Parliament and the British People, with the intent of maximising ‘vaccination’ uptake in the UK, in order to secure past and future material gains, at the devastating cost of civil liberties and the solvency of the nation.

a. You knowingly failed to disclose that the so called science and data relied upon by the World Health Organisation [WHO], in declaring SARS-CoV-2 to be a worldwide ‘pandemic’ on 11/03/2020, was none other than the discredited Imperial College Model.

b. You knowingly failed to disclose that SARS-CoV-2 was no longer classified as a High Consequence Infectious Disease on 13//03/2020 – before the 1st defendant presented and commended the Coronavirus Bill 2020 to the House of Commons, on the 19th and 23rd of March 2020, respectively.

c. You knowingly failed to disclose that the supposed latest science and data you relied upon to justify a declaration of a Public Health Emergency was Neil Ferguson’s unscientific Imperial College Model; and that it was known by 24/03/2020 at the latest that said model had been wholly discredited, when the New Scientist published the 4th defendant’s admission, before the Parliamentary Committee on Science and Technology, that he had reduced his prediction of 510,000 UK COVID deaths to 20,000, in the event his proposed lockdown policies were not imposed in the UK.


d. You knowingly failed to disclose that the executive agency the 1st defendant controls, Public Health England [PHE], received $500,000 from the US Government to “fast-track the COVID vaccine”, on or around 19/03/2020.

e. You knowingly failed to disclose that multiple WHO approved flu ‘vaccines’ are known to cause fatal adverse events in 377 out of every 100,000 healthy adults injected, whilst ‘influenza’ normally kills around 388 per year. [The ingredients in every UK licensed COVID ‘vaccine’ are believed to be very similar to these 2019-21 mRNA spiked flu ‘vaccines’, in which case they will have comparable mortality rates.]

f. You knowingly failed to disclose that none of the 2019-21 flu and COVID jabs are actually vaccines [they are mRNA treatments or gene therapies], which lays open the floodgates to future civil proceedings for misrepresentation, fraud and damages [irrespective of the purported indemnity granted to ‘vaccine’ companies and those who administer their products in the Coronavirus Act 2020].

g. You knowingly failed to disclose that there is a direct mathematical correlation between the 2020-21 flu and COVID ‘vaccine’ roll-outs in the UK and the deaths which the defendants claim to be COVID deaths during the same period.

h. You knowingly and dishonestly failed to disclose this information, when you had legal obligation to disclose it to Parliament and the British public, and you did so in service of the maximisation of ‘vaccination’ uptake in the UK and the rest of the world, for the purposes of securing their own material gains and those of their accomplices, knowing that the cost to the British People and the economy would be catastrophic.

i. You had a legal obligation to disclose these facts to the British People, on the ground that the 1st defendant, upon the advice of the 2nd, 3rd and 4th defendants, pledged on 01/03/2020, in the UK Government’s COVID-19 Battle Plan, that: “Public safety is our top priority.”The prosecution alleges that, had public safety been the defendants’ top priority, all of the foregoing information would have been disclosed to both Parliament and the British People, as soon as the information became available.

Moreover, in the mind of any reasonable person, knowing this information is essential to understanding that the entirety of the justifications given for declaring a Public Health Emergency were and remain founded on a series of profoundly dishonest statements, which have been relied upon by the defendants.

It naturally follows that the public disclosure of the information described, by either the 1st, 2nd or 3rd defendant at the UK Government’s daily press briefing, on or before 24/03/2020, would have been tantamount to a confession that there was no justifiable cause to declare a Public Health Emergency.Furthermore, the public disclosure of 8 e could and should have resulted in the suspension of the National Influenza Immunisation Programme and a thorough investigation of the allegedly lethal WHO approved mRNA spiked flu ‘vaccines’, which are considered all too similar to the substance of the COVID jabs subsequently licensed by the UK Government for mass administration.

However, it naturally follows that, without a ‘Public Health Emergency’, it would not have been possible for the defendants to cause the lockdown of the nation “until a vaccine is found”, with the fatally flawed advice you gave in your official capacities as Secretary of State for Health & Social Care, Chief Medical Officer, Chief Scientific Officer and the WHO and UK Government’s Senior Scientific Advisor on Pandemic Preparedness, Policy and Response.

The data-based evidence adduced by the prosecution also shows that, on the balance of probabilities, the vast majority of the deaths recorded as COVID deaths since September 2020, were, in reality, fatal adverse events, caused by the 2020-21 WHO and UK Government approved flu and COVID shots, in addition to those who died at home, in care homes and hospitals, who were denied palliative care “to save the NHS” from and “flatten the curve” of a ‘virus’ which has never been proven to exist.

Upon the evidence, the defendants committed section 3 fraud by non-disclosure, under the provisions of the Fraud Act 2006, on the basis that you knowingly and dishonestly failed to disclose information you had legal obligations to disclose to both Parliament and the British People, which you could and should have done in the House of Commons, as well as during the UK Government’s media briefings, at various times from 01/03/2020 to the present day, when you had ample opportunities to make public safety their top priority by fully availing Parliament and the British People of the latest science and data, as you repeatedly pledged to do, without ever actually delivering it.
Since there are public records which reveal the material gains secured by the defendants’ mutual commitments and contributions to the maximisation of ‘vaccination’ in the UK [and the rest of the world], the prima facie and circumstantial evidence relied upon in support of these criminal allegations amply demonstrates that all the elements of section 3 fraud by non-disclosure are in place and that the defendants should be indicted as charged.

URGENT APPLICATIONS BEFORE THE COURT

Given the unbridled seriousness of the allegations made, the prosecution is applying for summonses to be issued against the defendants without delay, to have you appear before a senior judge to plead and for the case is listed to be heard by a jury at the earliest opportunity.
A second application seeks a declaration, under the inherent jurisdiction of the court to act in the name of justice, that:
a. Upon the prima facie evidence adduced and in accordance with the opinion of Lord Sumption that the Coronavirus Act 2020 is constitutionally unlawful and therefore void and unenforceable, it is declared that, in the interests of providing finality to the families of those who are recorded as having died from or with COVID-19 and for the purposes of providing evidence in R [PUB] v Matt Hancock & Others, autopsies must be carried out and death certificates certified as if the 2020 Act had not been enacted.
b. For a period of at least 90 days, all flu and COVID ‘vaccinations’ are suspended, pending further criminal investigations into the allegation that the treatments concerned kill a minimum of 377 out of every 100,000 healthy adults injected.

For the avoidance of doubt, these proceedings are being brought in the absence of parliamentary, police or parliamentary intervention, without ill will, frivolity, vexation or malice, under the protection of the Treaty of Universal Community Trust.

In sincerity and honour,

Trustees of the People’s Union of Britain
All Rights Reserved – Errors & Omissions Excepted

The Great Escape To Freedom

DO YOU HONESTLY WANT CHANGE? ARE YOU DONE WITH PROTESTING YOUR SMALL CORNER TO FOCUS ON THE MAIN EVENT?

As a biker I always loved the Steve McQueen character in the film The Great Escape, jumping to freedom over the fence. What also resonated was the spirit of never allowing the bastards get you down. Defiance leading to escape from imprisonment. Each element had its vital role. There were no leaders yet several kinetic strategists. 

Yet here we, the majority, conforming to every crass, illegal and fraudulent diktat from regimes set upon us to silence any debate, let alone any questioning. 

Many of the rest are liking comments, up-thumbing armchair warriors and following delusional passionates who are endeavouring to make the same old, same old work miracles.

So many little efforts to tinkle within a system, while talking up the great game of escape, with not one jot of real wins. Those who believe they live in a democracy, where petitioning the criminals for easement of their imprisonment terms is a way through, are farting in the wind. Unbelievably ignorant of the futility with which they implore their lying governments to go easy, they continue their fruitless quest.

Then there are those that take hold of their pet cause and wave it about as some sort of solution, a key to escape. Yet what they are asking for is that their little island of freedom be incorporated into the overall prison persecution plan laid out for them, believing that is change.

All this is attempted before even the disparate groups of controlled opposition are spread liberally round good folk desperate for change. Agents provocateurs liberally scattered within well meaning causes create efforts that end up going nowhere.

“You are in prison. If you wish to get out of prison, the first thing you must do is realize that you are in prison. If you think you are free, you can’t escape.”
G.I. Gurdjieff

People have to ask themselves, having attended mass rallies with good intention and been beaten back, controlled as easy as it is to herd sheep into the pen, what is being achieved?

There is a movement to awaken people, yet easily introduced is the ‘woke’ principle. This crass attempt to be awake and aware of the present dystopia is merely the controllers throwing a fetid bone for all to fight over. Such nonsense may look like a brilliant crack of light in the darkness of despair to those too young and ill informed as to the ways of propaganda and mind control, yet to those of us who have lived through previous attempts at divide and conquer, it is merely more of the same.

Yes there has been abuse through all sorts of racism and divide and rule methodology. Yet making BLM (utterly controlled opposition), gender based stuff, etc the basis for ‘my rights’, is as short sighted as it comes. Human sovereign rights endow all these sub sections with their own validity. It is the overarching total that includes, corrects and establishes every sovereign being to be their own being. To believe any one matters more than another is a pup of a lie you have been sold. To engage and expect that “your “ freedoms will be engaged while still tolerating the present tyranny is madness and ignorance itself.

The level of expert insight and leadership is transparently thin within the change movements. The desire is huge, the will is great, yet real leadership, collective or individual is lacking. Yes, there are the figureheads that pop up, urge action yet have virtually no track record of success. Words, appearance, presentation is all there is. Ego, arrogance and self aggrandisement is all most of these types care for. Talking a good game is nowhere near the real game and its results. 

The characters of The Great Escape would have pissed all over these egos and self aggrandised puff balls. Breaking out from a prison containing us all for nearly one thousand years is no quick social media dance. It needs forethought, prescient planning and a mind far sharper that the psychopaths can muster. 

In what is transpiring, these events have arisen from some of the following successful results so far gained:
Revoking Consent to Be Governed (2008/9)
Exposure of Banking and Mortgage Fraud ( 2010–2020)
Discharged fraudulent claims against 
a) a film sales company
b) a car franchise
c) aa travel agent
d) 2 (two) Utilities companies
e) 3 (three) major credit card companies
f) dozens of debt collection agencies
and legal services companie
g) 5 (five) councils
h) The DVLA
i) The police
j) HMRC
k) the Registrar of Births
l) 2 (two) of the cartel’s protected banks

The service of all 657 MPs of the British Parliament Intended Private Criminal Prosecutions on each.

Most of these cases were dealt with under the Common Law. Many more were dealt with as summarily within the cartel’s own Admiralty courts.

So the question has to be asked:

If the many are truly more powerful than the few what the heck are we doing to muster that army of resistance, those troops of freedom, those warriors for justice?

So far all the same old rules of engagement have been to the advantage of the tyranny. That people cannot learn from these errors show the utter lack of leadership. That is a fact otherwise there would have been attention returned from the tyrants.

The only movement having true success now, today, at this precise moment is the one that is set to reestablish the Common Law into its rightful and eternal place as THE LAW OF HUMANKIND. No ifs, no buts, the absolute sovereign reestablishment of sovereign beings as the power.

Any trying to tinker round the edges is wasting precious energy and time, or worse are being knowingly led by the assets of the enemy’s intelligence services. Yes, we are deep in the WW3 and dirt is the name of the game these forces use to smear, besmirch and discredit valiant effort. The ease and unquestioning is a weapon we use on ourselves, delivered by the enemy to self inflict. Critical mindset needs developing not following on social media.

Last Wednesday was a tumultuous moment in our collective history. Not for nearly 1000 years have the people asserted their sovereignty. It was such a moment and with the prosecution of the Cabinet first, then the Parliament, we shall see a new dawn of joy, justice and peace.

Screenshot of part of the emails sent to Westminster on 30–09–2020

It is up to each and everyone seeking these values to make themselves known. To be ready to stand and witness this monumental moment in our lands. Herein we shall declare the breakout, the freedom and the glory that we the 99% are endowed with.

Can you imagine the fury, the upset, the foolishness felt when the maskers and adherents to political tyranny get this dose of truth. When they see those they placed their trust in carted off to be tried for fraud, treason and genocide?

Probably the biggest ‘I Told You So’ moment in history, though it must not be a vengeful moment. We are all better than that. It is a crime to hit someone who takes far longer to educate themselves. The education comes to us all as it comes and when it does it must be celebrated! We are each other’s teachers as well as students. The Common Law is just, it is based on the very tenets of lawfulness.

Therefore do not like this article alone, share it, share the truth far and wide. Enable everyone to be there when the curtain goes up on the new and falls heavily on the old.

www.thefreedomcycle.com
Let us know who you are, where you are that you may be given the precise details of your part in bearing witness to this moment in history.