REAL BREAKING NEW – Bromley Magistrates Court About to issue First Court Hearing

If you missed the last update, please read here before you continue reading this post, so that you are up to speed with all the latest developments in the case, which has now progressed from Westminster to Bromley Magistrates Court.

One week ago, we were informed by telephone that PUB’s PCP papers are now with the designated court’s listings department, who expect a case number will soon be issued, following checks by the legal team at Bromley Magistrates, to which it was transferred for processing and listing by the Westminster court where the case was laid last month.

Effectively, this means that the case files contained enough prima facie evidence of pandemic fraud for Westminster to transfer the case to Bromley, for the purposes of performing the final legal checks [the initial checks having been done by the south London court’s legal department] and listing the first hearing of the case at the Kent court.

Past Experience & Mansfield’s PCP
Experience has taught us, by way of the Hancock warrant application being dismissed at the end of 2020 [in the absence of enough prima facie evidence], upon the order of a district judge at Westminster Magistrates Court, who made his decision on paper [without a hearing], that we have already cleared the first major hurdle in the proceedings.

Moreover, were that not correct there is no realistic possibility that the case would have been transferred to Bromley’s listing department, especially given that particular judicial venue is where all PCP’s laid at Westminster are sent when sufficient evidence has been submitted to justify the listing of a hearing at Bromley Magistrates Court, which specialises in Private Criminal Prosecutions.

Furthermore, when renegade barrister, Michael Mansfield QC, acted for a retired Iraqi general in a PCP against former Prime Minister, Tony Blair, and others, for crimes of aggression in Iraq, the papers were laid at Westminster Magistrates, where they were dismissed on the grounds that the accused are immune from prosecution and the offence is unknown to UK law.

Nevertheless, Mansfield ran a High Court appeal of the decision, on the ground that the evidence cited against the defendants was sufficient for the case to proceed to trial. However, the court refused the appeal and upheld the ground that the UK does not recognise the crime of aggression under domestic law as being an indictable offence.

R [Rabbat] v Blair & Others
In corroboration of the foregoing, on 05/07/2017, Owen Bowcott wrote the following on R [Rabbat] v Blair & Others in The Guardian:

“An initial application to launch the prosecution was dismissed at Westminster magistrates court on the grounds that Blair enjoys immunity and that the crime of aggression does not exist in English law.

The court was told that attempts to persuade the international criminal court to prosecute to the former Labour prime minister for invading Iraq have made no significant progress.

The crime of aggression was finally defined in 2010 by the ICC, the high court heard, but it has not yet been ratified by a sufficient number of states.

The high court appeal is being heard by the lord chief justice, Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, and Mr Justice Ouseley.

The current attorney general, Jeremy Wright QC, has intervened in the case to argue that the crime does not exist in the statute book. “The crime of aggression is not known to English law,” James Eadie QC, for the attorney general, told the court.”

It was then reported in The Herald on 31/07/2017 that:

“Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, the Lord Chief Justice, and Mr Justice Ouseley dismissed the general’s application, saying there was “no prospect” of the case succeeding.

The case was brought after Westminster Magistrates’ Court refused to issue summonses in November last year on the grounds that the ex-ministers had immunity from legal action, and in any event the current Attorney General, Jeremy Wright QC, would have to give consent.”

Potential Reasons For Listing A Hearing
Therefore, on the balance of probabilities, the first hearing of R [PUB] v Hancock & Others is being processed by the legal department at Bromley Magistrates Court, for one or more of the following purposes:

To list a pleading hearing, in which case summonses will be issued to each of the defendants in due course [perhaps as early as this week].

To list a hearing of our informal application for a declaration that the autopsy moratorium on alleged COVID deaths be lifted and a moratorium be placed on all flu and COVID jabs [for a period of at least 90 days].

To list a preliminary hearing of the evidence adduced before a district judge, who will decide whether or not the case should progress to trial by jury on the charges laid.

That being said, the third possibility is a now somewhat remote one because PCP’s generally only get transferred to Bromley Magistrates Court when they are deemed to have enough substantive evidence to proceed to trial.

It also naturally follows that the action would have suffered the same fate as the Hancock warrant application [and Mansfield’s PCP] without leaving the jurisdiction of Westminster Magistrates, in the event that the district judge presiding at the court did not think that the case has at least a realistic prospect of securing criminal convictions against the defendants.

Common Law Always Provides A Remedy
Whatever the wrongdoing, be it a criminal or civil offence, the Common Law always provides a remedy, no matter how grave the circumstances surrounding the case.

Since murder is the ultimate heinous crime, mass murder by whatever means is the most wicked of wrongdoings under the Common Law.

However, when mass murder is being carried out by government policy, it is always the case that the state-controlled police and public prosecutor refuse to investigate such allegations by members of the oppressed masses, just as we have witnessed in Britain over the past year.

Nevertheless, in treacherous and dangerous times such as these, the Common Law provides the People with the means of bringing the perpetrators of mass murder by government policy to justice in a Private Criminal Prosecution.

It therefore goes without saying that, when [if not before] the PCP against Hancock, Whitty, Vallance and Ferguson succeeds in securing criminal convictions for multiple breaches of the Fraud Act 2006, another private prosecution will lay charges of mass murder against the defendants and their accomplices.
=======================
Full case history is here

When Bookies Refuse to Take the Wager You Know You’ve Won

Around 18 months ago you could walk into a bookie shop and lay a bet on Matt Hancock being kicked out of his Parliamentary position, with good odds. Luckily few people saw the opportunity and were able to save their pants.

You most probably could have laid odds on the number of deaths by Covid-1984 and made a bit or lost on the numbers game. If you had laid a bet on the likelihood of all this turning out to be one huge pandemic fraud, I am confidentially told that there would have been at least one big name bookie shop that would have given you very reasonable odds.

Sadly I do not have the facts to provide whether there are any ticket holders for that. However I can reveal that many have been going to the bookies and asking to lay bets on the likelihood that Matt Hancock, Chris Whitty, Patrick Valance and Neil Ferguson would be arrested before July.

To add my name to the list I entered my local Betfair and asked to be given the odds of these Four Horsemen of the Covid Apocalypse being sent down by September. The lady who I laid my enquiry skidded off to ask the manager what odds. I could see his face frown and nod a No.

In spite of the mask rules on offer, not taken by yours truly, of course, I sidled up and asked precisely why there was no trade on this one.

He grinned and admitted – “You gotta be joking, they’re a gonna. Everyone knows they are guilty as hell. We’d have to offer such dismal odds to be worthless.”

I smiled also to hear such truth and admission. I handed him a sticky from the Pandemic Fraud campaign and he nodded and said a huge thanks, as he took it with glee.

Prior to this visit I had purchased some much needed health stuff at Holland and Barrett. The lad behind the counter had admitted he thought it was all dodgy from way back, as I mourned the fact that him and his ilk did not feel brave enough to stand up and show their true colours. He also took a sticky and was grateful for the few minutes of information I poured in his direction. I left certain he would make use of the QR code and web address.

In the space of ten minutes I felt I had illumined several minds, though late, but closet minds opening are minds opening.

I also realised that this is the time that is the most important of all. Our endeavour to release the truth is no more important than right now. There are cracks all over this charade, this lunatic criminality. The harder we impress on others now, the easier the whole boatload will drown.

It is also to note of significance. It has been a mere week (discounting Easter) that the evidence bundle and case has been laid in court for due process to take its place – a week! Yet here we are at the point where the case is to be listed – in other words the summons will be served. For those that know about timing, process and the passage of these things this is supersonic. Some ask why – the answer is that there are far more people who refuse to buy the BS, the propaganda they spew out at us, and their assitance behind the cloak of the judiciary is huge.

The People will win, are winning – so join the People’s Union of Britain and become one of the prosecuting team, automatically!

=====================

Full story here – www.thefreedomcycle.com

P.U.B – www.thefreedomcycle.com/pub

Noose Tightens, Smell the Victory!

BREAKING NEWS FROM People’s Union of Britain


We have just received confirmation that the case files in the P.U.B. prosecution of the four horsemen of the Covid Apocalypse, are with the court’s listing department, who expect a hearing will soon be listed, following checks by the legal team at Bromley Magistrates, to which it was transferred for processing and listing by the Westminster court.

Being moved to the court which deals with all PCPs (Private Criminal Prosecutions), it is anticipated the fireworks will start going off very soon.

From the very start of this extraordinary case, it was always known to have taken a goodly time in getting to its present position. The major fraud case against both the mortgage and banksters took nearly 10 years to get this far, so looking at 10 months down the line we know, not only the case is rock solid but als that there are a huge swathe of the legal system behind us and making swift passage for the case of the centuries. This will be the single biggest legal case in the history of the British Isles.

There are many side cases going on yet this one in the High Court, probably the Old Bailey, the Common Law court of the Land due to a jury of 12 good men and women true, will be the show stopper of all showstoppers. The brilliant point is that its huge impact will force by every rule book the BBC, ITV, SKY and others to report truth for the first time in decades. It will destroy the curtain they have used to cover up so much criminality.

There is a squiddling’s chance of the judge being nobbled in the High Court, unlike the lower civil court that is rampant and built on criminal practices.

So ramp up your seat, buy in the popcorn and prepare for the best seats in the house to deliver day by day entertainment of exposure you have all longed for for too long!

=====================

A fuller update will appear in a day or so!

Greek Sailor Dies of Death

The Gates of Heaven were heard to slam shut earlier today as one of the major exponents of criminal filthiness was found to have died of both death and old age. The coroner, who undoubtedly will be called in, will pronounce death by Covid-1984.

There will be served a government edict to hold national mourning for one of theirs, a royal chasing Greek sailor, inveigling their place into a global criminal elite. On pain of fines and imprisonment all who defy the mourning regulation will be rounded up and incarcerated, to mitigate the responsibility of a criminal cartel whose alleged laws and diktats have been found to have been baseless and totally unsubstantiated.



Such are the desperate moves by an ever deeply encircled criminal cartel that their adherence to bullshit and lies grows ever more ridiculous as the days pass. Very soon it is expected the first four horsemen of the Covid Apocalypse are to be dragged out of their holes, incarcerated before their trials of the centuries. Yes, plural centuries, as this will be the start of the greatest legal case in the history of our isles.

Its impact will be world shattering, find out why here

Comments from the street are pretty much of one accord, when told an old, withered creature alleged to be called The Duke of Edinburgh had died:

“Did you hear of the death today of the Duke of Edinburgh?”

“Who?”

“Didn’t know Scotland had a Duke!”

“Duke Ellington died?”

“Aw, my gawd, how shocking! So the babies blood did not work?”

An American caught on vox pop, responded, “Heck we need less Dukes in this place, they are rampant. We got a Duke that fits all – Duke o’ Earl – why can’t you Brits be satisfied with a single Duke like us?”

Perhaps it is that he has a point. So many Dukes, Duchesses, Lords and Ladies is the reason we British never seem to get anything done in a timely manner. So perhaps one less will be a future blessing.

As for all those wishing to watch their hard earned income spent on a lavish, useless funeral and wake, we wish them closure as they rummage their back drawers to pay for the next meal or the bus ticket down to the jab centre where they will willingly sign their own death warrant, though they will never know or admit to that fact.

Royalty ought to be left to the Hollywood screen or fairy tale books as in the real life it offers only penury, theft and dereliction to those that worship such anachronisms. Each to their own, however this organ of truth falls on the side of “Who needs a Greek sailor to bring us the feel good factor?”

On a completely different tack, anyone wishing to donate to the Pedophile Trust, I fear you have happened upon the wrong article.

Census 2021 – Response Before Submission

That dreaded ten year anniversary of a national census arrives on March 21st 2021 to roars of Hurrah! Hurrah!

Well not exactly. In these times of tyranny and totalitarian overlording, it seems they finally wish to collect as much data as they can before it is too late. Too late for what some may cry. Too late for being uncovered as the the criminal types they are and the criminality their masters are forcing them to implement.

So we thought you ought to have the opportunity to stand up and tell these snoopy busybodies where they can go. This can be done in two ways:

Way One: Throw the census invitation down the toilet
Way Two: To ask them some salient questions before agreeing to comply with their dodgy ways


In this way we own our sovereign right to not be coerced by any authority having absolutely no right over us and secondly, to show a middle finger to such authority that wishes to rip the last vestiges of freedom from us and enchain us into eternal bondage and death.

Just notice how they are drooling for us to complete these tasks on the Spring Equinox – both a glorious day toward the Light and a Luciferian nudge toward the Dark Side

Here is a template you can use to your heart’s content, created by nobody for everyone. Remember always use the name they used to contact you – i.e. The Householder and then the address it arrived at. No more is needed!

The Householder
Any St
Anytown
County
Postcode
Date

Sir Ian Diamond,
alleged National Statistician
PO Box 1020
Dagenham
RM9 9QR


NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE
Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent

Dear Prof. Sir Ian Diamond,

There has been delivered to this address a letter sent to ‘The Householder’. It seems that someone somewhere believes there is someone of that name residing here, or at least contactable here.

First of all I would like to say that this neither my name nor anyone I am aware of within this property or my address Rolladex.

I am keen however to assist you, as you are asking said Householder to assist you with what you charmingly call “a census”. You also continue your imprecation with an advisory that all those so named as Householder should complete said census on Sunday 21 March 2021.

I imagine that such a profoundly important date, the vernal equinox, must presuppose some sort of magical incantation celebrating the collective harvesting of the people of Britain’s mass data. I will not further try and guess its purpose, as I wish to be of immediate assistance to your search and discovery, in the most expedient way possible.

Yet you follow your very kind ‘ask’ that the Householder’s help is proffered, with an implicit threat of not only a horrendously large fine of £1,000 but also stating that the completion of this “census” carries a legal requirement.

Sir Ian, in my book I have always found that a request followed immediately by a threat, is mostly found to emanate from the criminal fraternity, rather than from the pen of an alleged statistician, despite him working on behalf of an arm of an increasingly proven criminal fraudulent regime, calling itself government.

First of all may I say that in spite of attempts the present overlords coercing you to be the ‘hitman’ for this incredibly egregious unlawful attempt at forced entry into the private lives of millions, I would still wish to assist you in whatever way I can. I will therefore attempt to convey this request to said ‘Householder’ in the swiftest manner I am able, even though I have no idea where I might uncover said “householder”. I will, for expediency sake, perhaps call upon my friend M. Hercule Poirot, who in matters of solving unsolvable mysteries, is as you may be aware, an expert: Before I am able to do so, I will require the full material, factual and truthful answers to be presented me, in order to expedite your requests.

It is with that in mind I ask some reasonable, pertinent questions. Once these have been answered fully and factually, I am happy to further divulge on questions pointed at, and in my considered opinion, to be the sole territory of me, myself and I.

The census form in question will be completed and returned subject to receipt of full clarification of the points and questions contained in this notice. This is therefore a conditional agreement. This removes controversy and means that you no longer have any ultimate recourse to a court of law in this matter because there is no controversy upon which it could adjudicate.

For this reason, it is important that you consider and respond to this notice and respond in substance, which means actually addressing the points raised herein. The ‘nearest official form’ will not suffice, and consequently is likely to be ignored without dishonour.

Notice to one is notice to all should you not be in a position to respond with clarity to the points stated herein, a suitable officer or official must be delegated to fulfil these requirements.

On the other hand, there is a time limit on the agreement being offered. It is reasonable, and if it runs out, then you and all associated parties are in default, removing any and all lawful excuse on your part for proceeding in this matter.

You have apparently made demands upon ‘The Householder’. Those demands are not understood and cannot therefore be lawfully fulfilled. Clarification of your document is therefore required so that I or ‘The Householder’ may act accordingly. Failure to accept this offer to clarify and to do so completely and in good faith within 7 (seven) days will be deemed by all parties to mean you and your principle or other parties abandon all demands upon me and ‘The Householder’.

Please answer and clarify the following points and questions in full, with proof of all claims made:

  1. What law requires me to complete the census?
  2. From where does the Office for National Statistics derive the lawful authority to demand private information?
  3. Is there a limit to invasion of privacy?
  4. Is the Office for National Statistics lawfully authorised to demand Private property?
  5. How can we lawfully be penalised for failure to provide information?
  6. By what authority does the census collector threaten penalties for failure to provide personal information?
  7. Are there any circumstances whereby security agencies may access census information as suggested by section 39 subsection four of these statistics and registration services Act 2007?
  8. Since census data is being requested under pain of law enforcement and threat of financial hardship, are people able to decline answering, so as not to risk incriminating themselves, as authorised, for example, by the Data Protection Act?
  9. Because government search and seizure of private information is prohibited without a court warrant based on probable cause, current census policies violate that right, do they not?
  10. As the public have not been consulted on the consensus, please explain how this demand for private information is ‘democratic’.
  11. Please confirm or deny that any demand through correspondence such as the census form sent to ‘The Householder’, has any basis for legal status or legitimacy.
  12. The census form states, “the householder is responsible for ensuring that this questionnaire is completed and returned” – please provide details of the legal definition upon which the ONS depends in defining “the householder”.
  13. Does the census refer to the “sentient, physical, living man / woman or the “Legal Fiction/Person”, as identified by the birth certificates, passports, and other legal documents which have no legal bearing on this sentient, physical, living man / woman?
  14. Does the Office for National Statistics expect the sentient living man / woman to complete this census on behalf of the human being themselves or on behalf of the various paper documents, known as the Legal Fiction/Person, which they represent?
  15. Please provide proof of claim that I am a member of the society whose statutes and subsisting regulations you are enforcing.
  16. Please provide proof and legality whereby the ONS or any of its agents or so-called superior interests are lawfully allowed to encroach upon, demand and make threats to, not only a Private/Family Trust and all that fall under such Trust, but the sacred autonomy and privacy of said Trust granted under international law via the Universal Community Trust Treaty.
  17. Please provide proof of claim that there is a nameable SoC that I belong to, and that the laws covered within any alleged transgressions state that they apply to me within that named Society.
  18. Please confirm or deny that the census data will not be used directly or indirectly for the services of shareholders in any of the corporations involved in the running of Government Services.
  19. Please confirm or deny that the provided information will be used to form profit making strategies and policies that will affect well-being.
  20. Since every government database has been hacked, leaked, lost or compromised in some fashion, how exactly can the Office for National Statistics claim data security and protection of the information with confidence?
  21. Does the Office for National Statistics take full responsibility for any mishandled or mis-processed data, or loss of data, or unauthorised accessing of that data by third parties?
  22. How would the office for National Statistics locate, protect and compensate those individuals whose data becomes compromised?
  23. What evidence do you have that I am a United Kingdom resident?
  24. Please confirm or deny that the spiralling cost estimate of almost £650 million spent at a time of national bankruptcy is considered by the ONS to be wholly justifiable and appropriate.
  25. Please confirm or deny that the expenditure of tens of millions of pounds of taxpayers’ money in order to advertise the census is wholly appropriate and necessary at a time of national bankruptcy.
  26. Please confirm or deny that the census data will be handled by an offshoot of an American arms manufacturer Lockheed Martin, Lockheed Martin UK and SERCO, a widely known partner of Lockheed Martin.
  27. Please confirm or deny that Lockheed Martin have in the past been charged with illegally spying on UK citizens.
  28. Please confirm or deny that Lockheed Martin works with the CIA and FBI and that they have a lengthy record of crimes against humanity.
  29. Please confirm or deny that while it may be illegal for UK intelligence agencies to spy on the population without a warrant, that it is not illegal for US intelligence services to spy on the UK population with such a warrant.
  30. Given their track record for such actions please confirm or deny that Lockheed Martin have not in the case of the census consultancy paid bribes to individuals in order to secure the contract estimated at hundred of millions of pounds.
  31. It is suggested that Lockheed Martin have no moral fibre social conscience or scruples and it is further suggested that they are one of the most disreputable companies in the world – please confirm or deny this.
  32. It is suggested that thousands of lawsuits have been filed against Lockheed Martin for everything from racial discrimination to fraud. If this were the case, it would prevent them or any partners from fulfilling their contract with the ONS – please confirm or deny this.
  33. It is reported that Lockheed Martin have lobbied for the illegal war in Iraq and that they have been the main arms suppliers to the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq and Palestine, thus making them responsible for the death of millions of human beings – please confirm or deny this.
  34. Please confirm or deny that personal details collected in your census will be processed in a plant run by an American firm, staff of which were prosecuted for stealing the student loans records of US President Obama, among other incriminations.
  35. Please confirm or deny that the personal data collected by your census will not be sold, given, loaned or in any other way disseminated to companies offering online “directory” services such as 192.com or hard copy-based or online directory services such as Yellow Pages or Thomson local, or any similar or associated organisations.
  36. Please confirm or deny that all US companies are subject to the Patriot Act which allows the US government full access to any data in that company’s possession.
  37. It is claimed that only staff who work for the ONS will have access to the “full census data set”; please confirm or deny that it would not be possible for several members of ONS staff (each having access to separate data sets) to collude in order to collect together a full data set of information in contravention to the security measures supposedly put in place.
  38. Please confirm or deny that the statistics and registration services Act 2007 section 39 subsection four would allow disclosure of personal information to any and or all of the following:


a) The 56 geographical and eight non-geographical UK police forces and in particular the Devon and Cornwall Police who are currently owned by the Corporation known as International Business Machines (IBM).

b) The three UK intelligence agencies (MI5, MI6 and GC HQ).

c) The Department for Works and Pensions.

d) Private investigators working for the Department for Work and Pensions to hunt down alleged benefit cheats?

e) Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs tax investigators.

f) “Approved” insurance industry and “anti-fraud” investigators/private investigators.

g) The Home Office Border and Immigration Agency.

h) The Serious Organised Crime Agency (either for domestic investigations into serious crimes, or for these and also for minor investigations if requested by a foreign law enforcement agency under the mutual legal assistance treaties).

i) Lawyers in civil court cases e.g. for divorce, libel or copyright infringement etc.

j) Local authority trading standards departments.

k) Local authority environmental health departments.In relation to the notice on the front of the household questionnaire which reads “Your response is required by law”. Please provide details of which laws apply to the protection of personal information and your assurances that ‘your answers will be kept confidential’.

39. In relation to the notice on the front of the household questionnaire which reads “Your response is required by law”. Please provide details of which laws apply to the protection of personal information and your assurances that ‘your answers will be kept confidential’.

40. Can you confirm that “census information is kept confidential for 100 years. This would mean that when we send you information with all inputted information electronically to the address, they are securely stored and will remain unexamined by anyone for 100 years. Is this offer to contract not fraudulent and therefore null and void?

41. Please confirm the method by which the paper and electronic capture will be handled following the said capture of the information into electronic form.
a) If the paper and electronic information is to be stored please confirm under what circumstances storage will be carried out;
b) if the paper and electronic information is to be recycled, please confirm under which circumstances recycling will be carried out;
c) confirm or deny whether the physical form will be kept as security, as you say the ONS intends to keep the electronic data.  

42. Please confirm or deny that the census form constitutes a contract.

43. Given that individuals have been criminalised under UK terrorism legislation for causing information to be brought together, by being accused that by compiling such information (even if it be in the public domain), they are assisting potential terrorists – please confirm or deny that by providing information via the census form or electronically online, I will not be providing information to a foreign power who might have access to that data and so gain an advantage over this sovereign nation.

44. Given the ONS has confirmed that the census will go ahead despite the COVID-19 pandemic, in part because the information obtained will assist government and public understanding of the pandemic’s impact, please supply all material proof of such a pandemic to exist and all evidence and proof of existence of not only a virus existing but Covid-19’s existence, thus supporting claims for the necessity for questions asked in the 2021 census.

45. In order to maintain equality under law, please provide to me the exact same information required from me pertaining to each and every individual who has, is or ever will handle the census information in whatever possible form.

46. Given the premise that “time is money”, please provide documented proof under what authority the census must be completed in my own private time and at my own expense.

47. Please provide documented proof that I cannot charge a fee in advance for the provision of my time and personal information for the purposes of the census. Failure to do so will result in an invoice being issued which must be settled in advance prior to the completion of the census.

Please provide your response in the form of a “statement of truth”, sworn under penalty of perjury and upon your full commercial liability within (7) seven consecutive days of receipt of this notice. If your “full” response conforming to the above criteria is not received, within this appointed time it will be deemed a tacit agreement by virtue of your acquiescence that this census is unlawful and that there is no obligation to participate either as a Common Law sentient being or as the representative for the legal fiction identity and any further correspondence or communication on this matter must cease immediately.

With reference to section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970 and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, any attempt to contact me or “THE HOUSEHOLDER” regarding this matter after the appointed time will be in breach of these acts and will render you guilty of harassment and blackmail which may result in you being reported to the relevant bodies.

Please also note that by attempting to contact me or “the Householder” by telephone regarding this matter after the appointed time, you will also be in breach of the Wireless Telegraph Act 1949, which may result in you being reported to both Trading Standards and the Office of Fair Trading and may also constitute a criminal offence under section 127 of the Communications Act 2003.

Finally, you do not, nor have you ever had, my permission to use or process my personal data in anyway, and so pursuant to the Data Protection Act in 1998, I hereby demand that you cease use of any and all data with regard to me or ‘THE HOUSEHOLDER’, and that you immediately destroy all of my data held on your records. Failure to do so will result in a report being submitted to the Information Commissioner for data protection breaches.

This census form has been respectfully returned or refused to be filled in. Please reissue if or when all of the above points and questions have been addressed in full and all the required conditions have been met.

Sincerely without malice, ill will, vexation or frivolity.

THE HOUSEHOLDER

Without any admission of any liability whatsoever, and with all natural inalienable, rights reserved.
Errors and omissions accepted.

Copies of this notice of conditional acceptance have also been sent to: (by Royal Mail)

Census Customer Services,
ONS,
Segensworth Rd,
Titchfield,
Fareham ,
Hampshire
PO15 5RR

and:
FREEPOST 2021 Census,
Processing Centre,
UK

A ROYAL PEJORATIVE

OLD HAG BROUGHT OUT FOR SYMPATHY HIKE

A once-royal deposed pensioner makes dramatic plea on Zoom to aid and abet inveterate liar group as farce and fraudulent mass murder racket continues.

LED OUT TO SUPPORT CURRENT PLANDEMIC ADVANCEMENT

Masonic and Illuminati aids to the old woman prompted her to stay on message, when her plea for leniency over charges her husband and she were accused of, arising from their son’s exposé in low life activities, were leaked off mic.

CLEAR MASONIC AND ILLUMINATI SIGNATURES ON HEALTH AID

Back on message, her mumbled plea, over a Zoom call with sycophantic, so called health professionals, urged the country to think of all those zombies queuing for their first of several toxic jabs.

In a voice reminiscent of so many media psyop emotional pleas, to turn a nation-wide “Ahhh!” into full blooded support, her volume was turned up, emulating command and control in top gear:

“It is obviously difficult for people if they have never had a vaccine, because they ought to think about other people than themselves”

She went on to remark:

“It is not only here we have got the virus, but it is everywhere. It is a strange battle that everybody is fighting…”

Her compliant fellow Zoomers were keen to support her well scripted remarks and make many feel that what was proposed was as legit as it gets. She was then prompted to urge the nation, in some sort of out of place festive season speech to ‘Go for Jab, as your country expects no less of all of you than to comply to our plan‘. She was then prompted to say:

“It is remarkable how quickly the whole thing has, has been done, and so many people have had the vaccine already. So you have to keep up the good work.”

The habitual playbook of dragging out old queens to support present propaganda, is in many ways illustrative of the despair and frustration the present regime faces in not impressing the general public of its aims and true objectives.

Meanwhile, in the sleepy compliant West Country county of Somerset, MP William Rees Mogg, returning, according to anonymous sources, from a family holiday home in distant lands, denied any them and us approach to this ongoing deadly farce. Caught laid back on a far away beach, Rees Mogg, approached by a pre ordained and vetted ‘journalist’ asking sycophantic question of meaningless import, refused to comment. His parliamentary office, on the utterly meaningless interview, met inquiries with rage and accusations of unpatriotic support for a regime that is doing its best to slaughter the majority, under cover of supporting a totally unsupported NHS, due for privatisation later this year. The ongoing house arrest of the country was impressed to be unprecedentedly essential, unlike the travels of Rees Mogg and many other MPs, who, unlike the general populace, feel they have every right to ‘do their own thing’.

Several vox pop interviews now circulating on the Cesspool, otherwise known as social media, show that compliance has risen exponentially to the twin extensions of the lurgy, somnolence and couldn’t-give-a-fuckery. Both are seen to be spreading like wildfire, throughout the land, to the detriment of both sides to the argument.

In summary the old lady gets the last word and is quoted as saying:

“The jab didn’t hurt at all” 

The jury is now out as to whether she received an authentic jab of the toxic compound at all. The ‘couldn’t-give-a-fuckery’ crowd are presently busily involved in making left of centre moves to influence the jury’s decision.

We await further advances in this dangerous but riveting game.

When Social Media Are Our Censors

This is how we take them down

In the short history of social media, what started out as global interactive fora connecting us all through ‘friendships’, tweets and other mechanisms, has turned itself into a global censorship platform where only OfficialSpeak is condoned and promoted. Not part of the official narrative? – then “You’re banned!”

Without going into the depth of control and real time strangulation of not only decent debate but also any alternative views wishing to discuss, as most people like to do in any open and free society, the point has well and truly arrived at, where the terror of the truth being widely recognised is so great as to ban everything, mock everything and disrupt everything that is truth, threatening to become the reality. We are travelling at lightning speed into a dystopia no one wanted, some might say we are already deep within it, which would be hard to disagree with. So many so ignorant of what is happening. The rest too self centred and ill informed to even care.

Extinction is born out of this, and rightly so. However there are many who would dearly love to arrest this nihilist, blind adherent journey into night.

So confronting the poster boy of the greater plan – Covid-1984 – let us ask a few reasonable and apposite questions that frankly need to be answered before we can all wholeheartedly march in lockstep towards our oblivion.These reasonable questions must be asked before any semi intelligent person concedes to operate under any authority’s diktats. Of course many recognise that the authorities imposing these diktats, are themselves the very epitome of illegal and unlawful imposition. Let us for now put that to one side and simply ask these questions. These questions must by necessity be answered fully, factually and with material evidence, otherwise there is no reason or just cause to ban people from asking such normal questions, unless of course the agenda is to avoid, strike down and ban free speech and cognitive initiative. I shall leave to reader to decide that outcome:

Here are some of them:

  • 1. Evidence that masks prevent infection.
  • 2. Evidence that masks don’t cause oxygen deprivation which can lead to seizures.
  • 3. Evidence that breathing in your own carbon dioxide does not cause bacterial infections and respiratory disorders.
  • 4. Evidence that wearing masks does not cause stress and anxiety.
  • 5. Evidence that wearing masks prevented the spread of the Spanish Flu.
  • 6. Evidence that dismissal for not wearing a mask at work would not represent a material breach of the Equality Act, which entitles someone to claim compensation for discrimination, as well as unfair dismissal.
  • 7. Evidence that the government lurgy has ever been proven to exist.
  • 8. Evidence that the Coronavirus Act and the regulations which arose out of it are not adjudged to be repugnant and void under the common law.
  • 9. Evidence that it is not a crime ancillary to genocide to collaborate with government policy, which has already resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths in care homes and hospitals.
  • 10. Evidence that the government has not relied upon fraudulent data to frighten the population into fearful compliance with its legally unenforceable diktats.
  • 11. Evidence that vaccines are 100% safe to administer.
  • 12. Evidence that vaccines do not have any detrimental health effects, amongst which are, but not limited to,  neurological, physical impairment, paralysis, long lasting and detrimental side effects and/or death.
  • 13. Evidence that vaccines have been thoroughly tested according to the full rigours of historic testing procedures (usually lasting years) and do not fall short in any respect, of these essential processes .
  • 14. Evidence that vaccines have been able to halt /prevent the conditions they are allegedly created for.
  • 15. Evidence that keeping a safe distance(6ft/2m) apart is foolproof in stopping spread of infection from alleged Covid-19
  • 16. Evidence that a crowd of 2 people gathering is safer than a crowd of 3 or more people gathering in terms of preventing spread of an alleged pandemic Covid.
  • 17. Evidence that interacting with people in public and/or open spaces causes a health threat .

If anyone finds these questions and similar are a step too far or out of order then surely the nature of freedom of speech, holding alleged authority to the fire, wishing to have absolute evidence before commitment, is now against the best processes of life. That it is against the law can be mooted, yet the response must be against what law. Most likely responses to that are in the vein –

“Do not challenge what we say – just do it! What we say you must do” – which of course we all know is the mark of totalitarian authority.

QED – Zero Freedom!!

If, as with what they constantly bombard us, the very questioning of their almighty BS is a public health hazard, then surely we are dealing with utter nutcases, professional psychopaths, authoritarian followers and mere puppets of even greater species of the same. By that token alone every single member of the public ought to be rising up and saying a huge NO!

Sadly we have the majority of our country who have rolled over, unquestioning to these masters of lies, propaganda and mind control. If we were to recoil several decades and place this position into an invasion by the Nazis successfully taken, then we should see the very sinew of the population rolling over and creating a British Vichy. Most people will not know what the heck I refer to as all of that has been either expunged or not told to present generations. Their Me! Me! Me! desires have all been met. They give not one flying one for anybody but themselves. Their parents have, in the majority, had few decent critical brain cells to hand down, so we surely are dealing with a manifest pen of sheep.

Even so, against the odds, the minority always win through, so asking these reasonably presented questions is paramount.

The upside of all this is that it is these very questions that can be targeted, not only to those who try to impose governance on us but also to every single head of every single entity that colludes with the lies that the questions expose. It is for each and everyone of us who cherish truth, wish to retain the freedoms we believe and acknowledge are our natural given right. The payback is in what results from this exercise and that down the line is the extinction of those that follow the losers.

Every single supermarket, shop and trading establishment, every single employer who demands you obey, every single law enforcer, bully boy who demands you do this and that. Every single fine you may receive. Every single diktat coming from wherever needs facing off, lettering with the Letter Protocols we have for just this. Every travel quisling, every airline, every airport, port authority imposing whatever. Every pub that goes along every restaurant, every eatery, every one who says – DO IT BECAUSE YOU HAVE BEEN TOLD TO.

When people take back their power of NO! then change will transpire.

For now we have a powerful action prosecuted by the People’s Union of Britain – that is, by the way, you! – so join the PUB that is bringing the case against all this fraud – make it personal – make it you who is taking these criminals down!

So never ask what your country can do for you but ask what you can do for your people! The People of Britain

THE RALLYING CRY OF THE PEOPLE

No one, not even Social Media, will ever crush the voice of the people. Best way is to withdraw all support from these cancerous organs, yet the will of many is so weak and insecure it relates drawing off/leaving any social medium, as running from friends. Therein is the rub, the utter abrogation of taking personal 100% responsibility and action, the sheer intellectual inability to separate virtual from reality.

Still, all this we know. What those that continue to inflict on us do not know is the power of the pen over their overarching totalitarianism they wish to lock us down into. Pens as swords to the ready and let us launch an attack like they never have witnessed.

**PLEASE SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON EVERY SOCIAL MEDIUM YOU HAVE, SO AS TO SEE HOW THEY TREAT THESE QUESTIONS. WHEN ON A WAR FOOTING WE HAVE TO CHALLENGE IN EVERY WAY. THIS IS DIRECT CHALLENGE FOR A CONVERSATION AND FOR THE DEPTH OF CENSORSHIP WE MAY ENCOUNTER! TEASE ‘EM, TICKLE ‘EM AND ULTIMATELY DEFEAT THEM**

===================
About the Author

Jonathan L. Trapman

Author and photographer writing since age 9, photographing since age 10. A professional career as photojournalist, working for top titles in Fleet Street (London Times, Daily Express and very short, boring stint with the Sun newspaper) swiftly exposes him to propaganda and half truths demanded from photo/journalists of the ‘70s and 80s.

Deciding his soul to be worth more than shekels earned from the news rooms of corporate cronyism, went on to  become one of the industry’s foremost photographers. Enjoyed getting to know the world, its peoples and a far wider vision of life on earth on others’ behalf and at others’ expense. Appeared on TV and radio including BBC, France Inter and online radio.

Invited to speak at creative and literary conferences across the globe having in early 2012, in partnership with his wife, accomplished the first ever English translation, in over 900 years, of 11th century Sufi founder and mystic saint Hoja Ahmed Yassawi’s Diwani Hikmet (Divine Wisdom) poetry and sacred verse. Currently working on a 7 volume opus The Freedom Cycle, Dreams and Realities being the first, now published. www.thefreedomcycle.com
The Freedom Cycle is also the info hub for the People’s Union of Britain’s private criminal prosecutions against the array of main players in the present criminal farce.

highlylikelynews-512

GUEST AUTHORS

Views expressed by Guest Authors are their own, and are not reflective of HLN or its editorial team. HLN publishes these for research and educational purposes only. The text is presented for these reasons alone, and absolutely not for purposes related to promoting any of the views expressed herein


HANCOCK, WHITTY, FERGUSON AND VALLANCE SERVED NOTICE OF PRIVATE PROSECUTION FOR FRAUD

It has taken a while, yet the tightest private criminal prosecution for what will turn out to be the biggest case of criminal fraud perpetrated has the clock set in motion.

On the 21st February 2021 at 21.02.21 these four criminals were put on notice for crimes so heinous, so diabolical that the next little while the whole of the nation will be awoken to the fraud perpetrated on them case after case in the High Court. Here they will face a jury of 12 and try and extricate themselves from the charge of fruad, treason, genocide and mass murder.

It is expected to blow up the whole alleged fraud perpetrated by non disclosure of salient facts known to all four. Wrose their connection and blood money they took from the Gates Foundation foryears leading up to this criminality will point fingers at the very core of a cabal intent for decades in exterminating the majority of the planet in the cause of Agenda 21/30.

In spite of the many thousands already murdered in this fraud, it will be revealed how it all could have been prevented, if it were not for the high profits to be made.

Here below is the complete notice served the four:

R [PEOPLE’S UNION OF BRITAIN] [PROSECUTION]
VMATT HANCOCK, SECRETARY OF STATE FOR DHSC [1ST DEFENDANT]
CHRIS WHITTY, CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER [2ND DEFENDANT]
PATRICK VALLANCE, CHIEF SCIENTIFIC OFFICER [3RD DEFENDANT]
NEIL FERGUSON, IMPERIAL COLLEGE [4TH DEFENDANT]


FAO: MATT HANCOCK, CHRIS WHITTY, PATRICK VALLANCE & NEIL FERGUSONServed by email at 21:02:21 on 21/02/21.NOTICE OF INTENDED PRIVATE CRIMINAL PROSECUTION
Dear Sirs,

RE: R [PUB] v HANCOCK & OTHERS [2021]You are hereby served NOTICE OF INTENDED PRIVATE CRIMINAL PROSECUTION, in relation to the following charges of fraud by false representation and non-disclosure, pertaining to the statements you and the other defendants made, regarding the purported ‘COVID-19 Pandemic’.

SUMMARY OF CHARGES AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS

FRAUD BY FALSE REPRESENTATION

For all the elements of fraud by false representation to be in place, under section 2 of the Fraud Act 2006, the following must be proven:

a. Party A knowingly relied upon a false statement.
b. Party B was caused by Part A to rely on that false statement.
c. Party A did so with the intent of causing losses to Party B or for the purposes of procuring material gain.

Upon the evidence, the prosecution alleges that the defendants have knowingly relied and caused Parliament and the British People to rely upon multiple false statements during the ‘COVID-19 Pandemic’, with the intent of securing the maximisation of UK ‘vaccination’ uptake, as well as past and future material gains.
a (i) You knowingly and falsely claimed that COVID-19 [SARS-CoV-2] is “the most serious public health threat since the 1918 H1N1 influenza pandemic”.

(ii) Upon the evidence, the prosecution alleges that statement is plainly false because expert witness testimony and FOI requests show that neither SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19 have ever been empirically proven to exist and therefore cannot be the cause of a genuine pandemic.

b (i) You knowingly and falsely claimed that “without the social distancing of the entire population, home isolation of cases and household quarantine of their family members”, 510,000 British people would die from COVID-19.

(ii) Upon the evidence, the prosecution alleges that it is an indisputable matter of fact that this prediction has been mathematically proven to be false by the expert witness testimony adduced in this case.

c (i) You knowingly and falsely claimed that the UK Government’s COVID-19 policies “…will need to be maintained until a vaccine becomes available”.

(ii) Upon the evidence, the prosecution alleges that this statement is demonstrably false, on the ground that an obviously viable alternative was treating the unproven Coronavirus in accordance with pre-existing public policy, without adopting any of the lockdown policies imposed, thereby avoiding the unconscionable suspension of civil liberties and devastating financial losses the taxpayer.

All of these false statements are contained in the summary of the Imperial College Model, written and published by the 4th defendant on 16/03/2020, on the Imperial College website. However, additional evidence shows that the defendants began relying upon the erroneous computer-generated data on or before 01/03/2020, when the COVID-19 Battle Plan was announced by the 1st defendant and quickly implemented by the UK Government, without public scrutiny or meaningful parliamentary debate.

It is alleged that, in causing both Parliament and the British People to rely upon these plainly false statements, the defendants acted dishonestly, knowingly conspiring to maximise ‘vaccination’ uptake in the UK, whatever the cost, in order to secure past and future material gains.Thereby causing public sector borrowings, charged to the UK taxpayer, to rise to 100.8% of UK GDP [as of 20/11/2020]; and the house arrest of the entire population, which was all done by government diktats, each of which was founded on the plainly dishonest statements contained in the 4th defendant’s fraudulent Imperial College Model, which was funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [which, for the sake of brevity, we will refer to as the Gates Foundation].Since there are public records which reveal the material gains secured by the defendants’ mutual commitments and contributions to the maximisation of ‘vaccination’ in the UK [and the rest of the world], the prima facie and circumstantial evidence in support of these serious allegations amply demonstrates that all the elements of section 2 fraud by false representation are in place and that the defendants should be indicted as charged.
FRAUD BY NON-DISCLOSURE
For all the elements of fraud by non-disclosure to be in place, under section 3 of the Fraud Act 2006, the following must be proven:
a. Party A failed to disclose certain information to Party B.
b. Party A was under a legal duty to disclose that information to Party B.
c. Party A did so dishonestly, intending, by that failure, to make a gain or cause a loss.

Upon the evidence, the prosecution alleges that the defendants knowingly failed to disclose information you had legal obligations to disclose to both Parliament and the British People, with the intent of maximising ‘vaccination’ uptake in the UK, in order to secure past and future material gains, at the devastating cost of civil liberties and the solvency of the nation.

a. You knowingly failed to disclose that the so called science and data relied upon by the World Health Organisation [WHO], in declaring SARS-CoV-2 to be a worldwide ‘pandemic’ on 11/03/2020, was none other than the discredited Imperial College Model.

b. You knowingly failed to disclose that SARS-CoV-2 was no longer classified as a High Consequence Infectious Disease on 13//03/2020 – before the 1st defendant presented and commended the Coronavirus Bill 2020 to the House of Commons, on the 19th and 23rd of March 2020, respectively.

c. You knowingly failed to disclose that the supposed latest science and data you relied upon to justify a declaration of a Public Health Emergency was Neil Ferguson’s unscientific Imperial College Model; and that it was known by 24/03/2020 at the latest that said model had been wholly discredited, when the New Scientist published the 4th defendant’s admission, before the Parliamentary Committee on Science and Technology, that he had reduced his prediction of 510,000 UK COVID deaths to 20,000, in the event his proposed lockdown policies were not imposed in the UK.


d. You knowingly failed to disclose that the executive agency the 1st defendant controls, Public Health England [PHE], received $500,000 from the US Government to “fast-track the COVID vaccine”, on or around 19/03/2020.

e. You knowingly failed to disclose that multiple WHO approved flu ‘vaccines’ are known to cause fatal adverse events in 377 out of every 100,000 healthy adults injected, whilst ‘influenza’ normally kills around 388 per year. [The ingredients in every UK licensed COVID ‘vaccine’ are believed to be very similar to these 2019-21 mRNA spiked flu ‘vaccines’, in which case they will have comparable mortality rates.]

f. You knowingly failed to disclose that none of the 2019-21 flu and COVID jabs are actually vaccines [they are mRNA treatments or gene therapies], which lays open the floodgates to future civil proceedings for misrepresentation, fraud and damages [irrespective of the purported indemnity granted to ‘vaccine’ companies and those who administer their products in the Coronavirus Act 2020].

g. You knowingly failed to disclose that there is a direct mathematical correlation between the 2020-21 flu and COVID ‘vaccine’ roll-outs in the UK and the deaths which the defendants claim to be COVID deaths during the same period.

h. You knowingly and dishonestly failed to disclose this information, when you had legal obligation to disclose it to Parliament and the British public, and you did so in service of the maximisation of ‘vaccination’ uptake in the UK and the rest of the world, for the purposes of securing their own material gains and those of their accomplices, knowing that the cost to the British People and the economy would be catastrophic.

i. You had a legal obligation to disclose these facts to the British People, on the ground that the 1st defendant, upon the advice of the 2nd, 3rd and 4th defendants, pledged on 01/03/2020, in the UK Government’s COVID-19 Battle Plan, that: “Public safety is our top priority.”The prosecution alleges that, had public safety been the defendants’ top priority, all of the foregoing information would have been disclosed to both Parliament and the British People, as soon as the information became available.

Moreover, in the mind of any reasonable person, knowing this information is essential to understanding that the entirety of the justifications given for declaring a Public Health Emergency were and remain founded on a series of profoundly dishonest statements, which have been relied upon by the defendants.

It naturally follows that the public disclosure of the information described, by either the 1st, 2nd or 3rd defendant at the UK Government’s daily press briefing, on or before 24/03/2020, would have been tantamount to a confession that there was no justifiable cause to declare a Public Health Emergency.Furthermore, the public disclosure of 8 e could and should have resulted in the suspension of the National Influenza Immunisation Programme and a thorough investigation of the allegedly lethal WHO approved mRNA spiked flu ‘vaccines’, which are considered all too similar to the substance of the COVID jabs subsequently licensed by the UK Government for mass administration.

However, it naturally follows that, without a ‘Public Health Emergency’, it would not have been possible for the defendants to cause the lockdown of the nation “until a vaccine is found”, with the fatally flawed advice you gave in your official capacities as Secretary of State for Health & Social Care, Chief Medical Officer, Chief Scientific Officer and the WHO and UK Government’s Senior Scientific Advisor on Pandemic Preparedness, Policy and Response.

The data-based evidence adduced by the prosecution also shows that, on the balance of probabilities, the vast majority of the deaths recorded as COVID deaths since September 2020, were, in reality, fatal adverse events, caused by the 2020-21 WHO and UK Government approved flu and COVID shots, in addition to those who died at home, in care homes and hospitals, who were denied palliative care “to save the NHS” from and “flatten the curve” of a ‘virus’ which has never been proven to exist.

Upon the evidence, the defendants committed section 3 fraud by non-disclosure, under the provisions of the Fraud Act 2006, on the basis that you knowingly and dishonestly failed to disclose information you had legal obligations to disclose to both Parliament and the British People, which you could and should have done in the House of Commons, as well as during the UK Government’s media briefings, at various times from 01/03/2020 to the present day, when you had ample opportunities to make public safety their top priority by fully availing Parliament and the British People of the latest science and data, as you repeatedly pledged to do, without ever actually delivering it.
Since there are public records which reveal the material gains secured by the defendants’ mutual commitments and contributions to the maximisation of ‘vaccination’ in the UK [and the rest of the world], the prima facie and circumstantial evidence relied upon in support of these criminal allegations amply demonstrates that all the elements of section 3 fraud by non-disclosure are in place and that the defendants should be indicted as charged.

URGENT APPLICATIONS BEFORE THE COURT

Given the unbridled seriousness of the allegations made, the prosecution is applying for summonses to be issued against the defendants without delay, to have you appear before a senior judge to plead and for the case is listed to be heard by a jury at the earliest opportunity.
A second application seeks a declaration, under the inherent jurisdiction of the court to act in the name of justice, that:
a. Upon the prima facie evidence adduced and in accordance with the opinion of Lord Sumption that the Coronavirus Act 2020 is constitutionally unlawful and therefore void and unenforceable, it is declared that, in the interests of providing finality to the families of those who are recorded as having died from or with COVID-19 and for the purposes of providing evidence in R [PUB] v Matt Hancock & Others, autopsies must be carried out and death certificates certified as if the 2020 Act had not been enacted.
b. For a period of at least 90 days, all flu and COVID ‘vaccinations’ are suspended, pending further criminal investigations into the allegation that the treatments concerned kill a minimum of 377 out of every 100,000 healthy adults injected.

For the avoidance of doubt, these proceedings are being brought in the absence of parliamentary, police or parliamentary intervention, without ill will, frivolity, vexation or malice, under the protection of the Treaty of Universal Community Trust.

In sincerity and honour,

Trustees of the People’s Union of Britain
All Rights Reserved – Errors & Omissions Excepted

When History Whips its Venom

It is a very well established nostrum that what went on in the years between 1938-1945 was the perpetration of the most evil acts, heinous enough to build a story round to exercise, out of all proportions, the utterly worn phrase of “Lessons learned , Never again”

A state of war only serves as an excuse for domestic tyranny
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn


That one particular genocidal focus has been used to stamp its infamy upon a global population since that time, is in itself a perpetration of gross propaganda, exaggeration and specious political and tyrannical manipulation. Such manipulation seems to have developed an almost fanatic hunt for every heretic that even mentions, or worse, questions its veracity as laid out by the manipulators.

It has become more and more obvious that those questioning, utterly reasonably, the whys and wherefores of alleged history are treated as treasonous, criminal and lunatic conspiracy thinkers. The timeline of these attacks and ‘outings’ all follow an all too familiar pattern. One of smashing alternative views, where the diktats of the oppressive power structure or authoritarian rule must at all costs maintain and the obsessive maintenance their narrative hangs absolute and true.

It has been a long and tedious journey from there to today, where the pincers of tyranny demand, with heavy hand, no divergence, no speaking of any other course than what has been determined as “the facts”.

Such autocratic imposition sits heavily on a sovereign being. The burden accepting such ridiculous demands, runs so contrary to exhortations of free speech, freedom of thought and constructive discussion of any and all things, necessarily leads to challenge.

That challenge has, in the past, led to wars. Wars, as are blatantly obvious, have led to the same old, same old, changeling from one colour to another repeating the same cyclical lunacy of a little awakening followed by an even heavier foot slamming down along the road.

To arrest this venal, repetitive illness demands truth, full front and transparent. The lessons learned, never again incantation is as vacuous now as it was at every previous utterance.

That is to say, while pacifying the people with such shallow stuff the perpetration of what went on over the years of the Second World War, merely can be seen as an experiment moving deeper into consolidation.

Today we are faced with genocide perpetrated on a global scale. The control of the narrative pervasively spread to protect a psychopathic cabal of evil while extending its plan, has now burst forth in such blatant transparency, prosecution of lies, charade, implementation as acts of genocidal horror, the original poster boys of such crimes would have been envious, to say the least.

Around the world, with a population captured in the thrall and hypnotic gaze of a plandemic, implemented, following tried and tested propaganda, initiating at the beginning of the 20th century, their plan now evolves. Technical advances supercharge this, the final seal of a dream so long fostered and written down.

“War is the greatest plague that can afflict humanity, it destroys religion, it destroys states, it destroys families. Any scourge is preferable to it”

– Martin Luther


To follow their playbook, encouraging us to rebellion, riot and ultimately war was never going to be the solution. As much as individuals awakened to the horrors perpetrated, knee jerked towards that, wisdom and sanity know this is not the road to take.

Thus the solid, richly populated, with evidential and material proof, way of approach becomes the only way to proceed.

Although global in its reach, this tyranny demands focus on a central point – a point where both solution and cause meet at its epicentre, must be the way to go.

It is why the British Isles becomes that focus. It is how the beast of evil is mortally injured at its heart. It is where the very global revival of humanity’s solutions become reborn in fullness, justice and peace.

The British people’s success in confronting, bringing to justice the venal evil of tyranny, spreading, like a serpent through all veins of humanity, spurns the rebirth of the sovereign human, the freedom indelibly printed on each soul birthing into life. It is why the present prosecution by the Peoples Union of Britain of those involved has been enacted.

The end goal is permanent silencing a tyranny that has strangled the rights and lives of so many for near a thousand years. It initiates peace, justice and the true freedom ascribed each and everyone of us at birth.

The war started many years ago, the battles now are for the heart of the matter. The question must be – are we prepared to give all for freedom or meekly accept our lot of ongoing slavery at the whim and fancy of a psychopathic tyranny, we have cowered under, as our make believe saviours and protectors?

That holds an obvious answer – yet watching the multitudes, in fear and transparent trepidation believing the BS fed as meat and veg, one can possibly wonder the outcome.

However, if there was ever a time more appropriate for truth to show its winning hand, it is now. Faith in better is a demand sometimes hard to hold fast, yet it is needed now more that ever. We grow together or we perish alone. There is no starker reality, nor truth.

Within that aspiration towards better, the case presently presented and mobilised by The Peoples Union of Britain will initiate justice, create the changes that spark the most dramatic journey of evolution humanity has ever had the joy to witness. In truth there is no other means presently available for such a seismic shift in things.

There are many efforts to encourage people to rise against the machine, yet so much of that has contained no clear action plan that achieves those ends, without remaining within the machine. Much of that tinsel is in fact the opposition dangling distraction in the shape of carrots.

We know that those ranged against us are more frightened, more terrified than all of our collective fear put together. They have so much as admitted that, even as they try and close our efforts down – never to any degree of success. They know they are up against the most formidable force they never expected to encounter – The People. It is the people that will bring off the single greatest expansion of human endeavour.

The venom of truth, justice and of peace is as terminal as any thrust from a dark force, imagining itself omnipotent.

“Lessons learned, never again” issuing from the lips of the people will be the very first time this exhortation becomes a reality for future tens of thousands of generations – so make it so, join, get behind the Peoples Union of Britain (PUB) and see victory and freedom ours and ours alone.
========================================


Useful links: PUB – The Peoples Union of Britain
The Timeline of Prosecution
The Bernician Blogwhere the history and raison d’être is recorded
The Freedom Cyclewhere the true narrative is laid out
The Universal Community TrustWhere sovereign being becomes a reality

When the Face Mask Becomes the New Nazi Salute

It may shock some to read this, however the situation has become so serious as to make  the comparison justified in what this all is intended to lead onto.

A face mask is the de rigeur statement of allegiance to the Party line. If you do not obey, align yourself with the specious, shallow and now negated health gains via the face mask, you are marked as domestic terrorist, criminal perpetrator of potential death to those around you and an irritant purveyor of resistance against the Holy Writ of Government criminality.

A surgical face mask, in a surgical situation does it job, properly, expediently and properly. Masks used outside that environment are usually for workshops, paint shops and other essential health protection.

The array of masks now seen on the streets, in shops and all other sorts of public places are the delusional, fanatic show offs of people who have never researched the stupidity of their action. I shall not delineate the various sources that back my statements, for if people have not seriously done their own homework by now, it would not make the slightest inroads to them, in changing their minds. These people are so ponerised by the authoritarian edicts spewing forth hourly from the mainstream media, any contrary viewpoint will be just sniggered at, insulted by conspiracy theorist accusations and other ignorant reposts.

These people are also the problem being the yes folk enabling such such trials by mask  to take place in the first instance. This social experiment, done in full sight, is to test, not only the gullibility of the people but also how most effectively AI track and trace of partial facial recognition can be executed.

The authorities also would love their acolytes to turn in those disobeying non legal edicts, and those not wearing their masks. Unfortunately the law is presently not on their side. There will come a time when, shortly, turning in the neighbour will be efficiently performed by these quislings as badges of honour – serving the State in the best way.

The Nazi salute, face wearing, designates compliance to fascist rulers, portrayed as democratic benefactors of safety and freedom. The world is being turned upside down and the friggin’ New Normal will be the Overlording through AI, Internet tracking and use of public spies State Operated Control.

Do not despair, dear Outsiders, revolutionaries and sane agents of truth – we still have the neutron bomb of repellant to aim and serve these evil self serving maniacs who wish to destroy our life as we have known it. That bomb will be their own weapon of attrition, used back against them, with a far deadlier intention. When it is served, all the compliant puppets, civilian and corporate will be held to account and asked to answer for their criminal and treasonous compliance with an evil system. Their turn in the ducking pool, feather and tar pit and stocks will be rightful justice for treason.

We may be in deep warfare with the enemy, however we have unleashed a weapon of mass destruction against the deception and traitorous intent. Actions that are intent on changing life as we know it are being brought to book. It demands we all partake in withdrawing support for any part of their game. It is a non violent, precision aimed campaign, whose effect is terminal to their ends and rightly will expose all who covertly and openly support this criminal regime.

To play your part in this resistance finale and accomplish this deadly assault, we have to forget everything we’ve been brainwashed to believe, everything learned at the teat of elite governance . Education at double speed time is imperative.

One of the most powerful ways to neutralise corporate, media, anti health, political tyrannies is to launch into the Letter Protocols. This reverse engineering of their very own weapons to rule us and use us are now turned on them to neuter, bleed and ruin them in their present system, while funding, supporting the very people who have for life been stripped of worth and endeavour

These are unique times and the methods we use are unique, extant for nearly 2,300 years and as just now as ever it has been.

Who has the fearless determination, the courage to act and the perseverance to make it happen?

That is the only question needing an answer…..

===========================
WARNING:

There are a plethora of movements, purporting to represent the resistance, yet who have by their own admission or omission shown themselves to be merely controlled opposition by the very forces doing their darnedest to stifle the win we have already won on so many levels.
===========================

The Sovereign era is upon us. Its speed to become is down to each of our efforts to positively get behind, create and mobilise peaceful civil disobedience and non-compliance, become protected behind the invincible protection of both the Universal Community Trust and its global protection , the internationally recognised Universal Community Trust Treaty.

It is time each and everyone who is intent on taking down this tyranny to disengage, release by forming their own private/family trust under the protection of UCT

=============================

The Peoples Union of Britain is presently prosecuting each member of the UK Parliament, its aids and abettors. This case will inevitably leave a lasting scar and will result in the death of this and all tyrannical regimes around the world that presently wield their murderous ways.

A scar that the P.U.B will look forward at being at the vanguard of bringing the Common Law of the land back to its rightful place as the law of these isles.

To that end we call upon all good man and women to join the PUB and work together and help implement the single biggest change in the history of humanity