Loosely based on Lewis Carrol’s Jabberwocky
You know when you are about to present the most stunning piece of theatre imaginable, the one thing that you really have to focus on is the PR, the pre-curtain chatter about what may be in this ever greater spoken of production.
Promotion by word of mouth, adherents to the director, producer and script – the previous success this group has had in magnificent efforts really push the buzz forward.
Yet the most spectacular promotion has to come, not from the mainstream – yes they do their bit – but from the characters themselves, in real life, who with arrogance and utter blindness to their action create the very stage where the interest gets larger and larger. The bullhorns tag onto these antics and like lickspittle they are, promote it as if they are the Distractor Generals, they have been told to be.
The Dominic Cummings soap is set to play deeper as days go by. Yes. a distraction from the main theme, yet in its distraction it shows clearly what the PUBs prosecution had foretold months ago – that the in fighting and eye scratching would begin in earnest and vitriolic splendour. The timing could not have been narrowed down to days or hours, yet it could be totally predicted.
The glorious thing is, it has only just begun.
Now I realise many have known the Mainstream has always been the bullhorn of Government propaganda. Just this past weekend when upwards of 500K, to over a million of the good people of Britain came to the capital expressing their various disgusts with the tyranny. Not a whisper from the BBC.
“Organisers of Saturday’s peaceful protest estimate 750,000. Police helicopter feedback is apparently 1 million people…”Facebook Fact Check
May I suggest that everyone with a handheld or laptop go to the Complaints Dept. at the BBC, Sky and the other usual suspects and voice a complaint about zero to negligible coverage. Inundate them online, show them we know their dirty games. It will at least give them the headache, not us.
However back to the upcoming Pandemic Fraud trial, we are seriously watching, as so much of the pre trial razzamatazz is being remarkably orchestrated by the criminals themselves! It is true that many of us are calling for their heads on a guillotine, yet remind yourselves this is taking place in the High Court, let us do hope it will be, at least, the Old Bailey, as I am such a romantic. One thing is for sure is that justice will be served.
To all those that take the pessimistic take on them escaping scott free, you first must not be inveigled into the thought pattern that these bastards will get away with it. Remember Jonathan Aitken and Jeffrey Archer. They both did not escape justice, even though they were sitting MPs. Secondly, there are too many on the inside who are doing their quiet utmost to get this thing rolling. Third, this is the turning point in history, where none of the shenanigans will be able to stop the inevitable roll towards a new era and a victory built on peaceful change.
It may be Bromley Magistrates Court that offers the initial summons to court, yet because of its magnitude, it seems the West End, oops sorry, the Bailey will be the centre stage for this incredibly, long desired outcome.
Today in the Grauniad, a most esteemed turncoat of MI5 filled journos, an article by Andrew Rawnsley, a competent scribbler, gave us a huge leg up – well I say us – what I really mean are all those Grauniad readers, too oblivious or lazy to seek truth, to begin to at least have their fav scribblers feed them food for thought. Sleaze it will never be – fraud, treason, genocide and mass murder, it most definitely will be.
The sleaze of Boris’s fitting out of No10 at the expense of toe rags, of course distracts, yet it paints the scurrilous toff for what he is.
Now the Daily Mail at the best of times is too far down the gutter to retrieve, yet it is useful to note the sort of headlines they produce at the moment:
Once again a pop at the PM.
Dear reader, you see what these rags are doing, apart from throwing some of their most supported masters under the bus. They are prepping themselves for the inevitable. That being, where they get their aiding and abetting orders from the courts.
Trying to save your arse, already punctured with assailing shafts from above, is common practice in criminality. Bozo has already made it quite clear behind closed doors, he is happy to squeal like a piglet, to save his. We suggest he chats with fellow criminal, Cameron, on that subject – pigs, I mean.
The day of reckoning is so close you could almost touch it. These petty and grand criminals will be doing so much more of this, turning on each other, that it will become, by their own hands, the best show in town.
Let us support the media that continues to highlight these spats. They are at last doing, in a roundabout way, their job for us. As for the front row seats, let us hope that this revolution will be televised like no other.
We are working on that!
For all the latest news make sure to keep The Freedom Cycle P.U.B. latest bookmarked
If you missed the last update, please read here before you continue reading this post, so that you are up to speed with all the latest developments in the case, which has now progressed from Westminster to Bromley Magistrates Court.
One week ago, we were informed by telephone that PUB’s PCP papers are now with the designated court’s listings department, who expect a case number will soon be issued, following checks by the legal team at Bromley Magistrates, to which it was transferred for processing and listing by the Westminster court where the case was laid last month.
Effectively, this means that the case files contained enough prima facie evidence of pandemic fraud for Westminster to transfer the case to Bromley, for the purposes of performing the final legal checks [the initial checks having been done by the south London court’s legal department] and listing the first hearing of the case at the Kent court.
Past Experience & Mansfield’s PCP
Experience has taught us, by way of the Hancock warrant application being dismissed at the end of 2020 [in the absence of enough prima facie evidence], upon the order of a district judge at Westminster Magistrates Court, who made his decision on paper [without a hearing], that we have already cleared the first major hurdle in the proceedings.
Moreover, were that not correct there is no realistic possibility that the case would have been transferred to Bromley’s listing department, especially given that particular judicial venue is where all PCP’s laid at Westminster are sent when sufficient evidence has been submitted to justify the listing of a hearing at Bromley Magistrates Court, which specialises in Private Criminal Prosecutions.
Furthermore, when renegade barrister, Michael Mansfield QC, acted for a retired Iraqi general in a PCP against former Prime Minister, Tony Blair, and others, for crimes of aggression in Iraq, the papers were laid at Westminster Magistrates, where they were dismissed on the grounds that the accused are immune from prosecution and the offence is unknown to UK law.
Nevertheless, Mansfield ran a High Court appeal of the decision, on the ground that the evidence cited against the defendants was sufficient for the case to proceed to trial. However, the court refused the appeal and upheld the ground that the UK does not recognise the crime of aggression under domestic law as being an indictable offence.
R [Rabbat] v Blair & Others
In corroboration of the foregoing, on 05/07/2017, Owen Bowcott wrote the following on R [Rabbat] v Blair & Others in The Guardian:
“An initial application to launch the prosecution was dismissed at Westminster magistrates court on the grounds that Blair enjoys immunity and that the crime of aggression does not exist in English law.
The court was told that attempts to persuade the international criminal court to prosecute to the former Labour prime minister for invading Iraq have made no significant progress.
The crime of aggression was finally defined in 2010 by the ICC, the high court heard, but it has not yet been ratified by a sufficient number of states.
The high court appeal is being heard by the lord chief justice, Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, and Mr Justice Ouseley.
The current attorney general, Jeremy Wright QC, has intervened in the case to argue that the crime does not exist in the statute book. “The crime of aggression is not known to English law,” James Eadie QC, for the attorney general, told the court.”
It was then reported in The Herald on 31/07/2017 that:
“Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, the Lord Chief Justice, and Mr Justice Ouseley dismissed the general’s application, saying there was “no prospect” of the case succeeding.
The case was brought after Westminster Magistrates’ Court refused to issue summonses in November last year on the grounds that the ex-ministers had immunity from legal action, and in any event the current Attorney General, Jeremy Wright QC, would have to give consent.”
Potential Reasons For Listing A Hearing
Therefore, on the balance of probabilities, the first hearing of R [PUB] v Hancock & Others is being processed by the legal department at Bromley Magistrates Court, for one or more of the following purposes:
To list a pleading hearing, in which case summonses will be issued to each of the defendants in due course [perhaps as early as this week].
To list a hearing of our informal application for a declaration that the autopsy moratorium on alleged COVID deaths be lifted and a moratorium be placed on all flu and COVID jabs [for a period of at least 90 days].
To list a preliminary hearing of the evidence adduced before a district judge, who will decide whether or not the case should progress to trial by jury on the charges laid.
That being said, the third possibility is a now somewhat remote one because PCP’s generally only get transferred to Bromley Magistrates Court when they are deemed to have enough substantive evidence to proceed to trial.
It also naturally follows that the action would have suffered the same fate as the Hancock warrant application [and Mansfield’s PCP] without leaving the jurisdiction of Westminster Magistrates, in the event that the district judge presiding at the court did not think that the case has at least a realistic prospect of securing criminal convictions against the defendants.
Common Law Always Provides A Remedy
Whatever the wrongdoing, be it a criminal or civil offence, the Common Law always provides a remedy, no matter how grave the circumstances surrounding the case.
Since murder is the ultimate heinous crime, mass murder by whatever means is the most wicked of wrongdoings under the Common Law.
However, when mass murder is being carried out by government policy, it is always the case that the state-controlled police and public prosecutor refuse to investigate such allegations by members of the oppressed masses, just as we have witnessed in Britain over the past year.
Nevertheless, in treacherous and dangerous times such as these, the Common Law provides the People with the means of bringing the perpetrators of mass murder by government policy to justice in a Private Criminal Prosecution.
It therefore goes without saying that, when [if not before] the PCP against Hancock, Whitty, Vallance and Ferguson succeeds in securing criminal convictions for multiple breaches of the Fraud Act 2006, another private prosecution will lay charges of mass murder against the defendants and their accomplices.
Full case history is here
Around 18 months ago you could walk into a bookie shop and lay a bet on Matt Hancock being kicked out of his Parliamentary position, with good odds. Luckily few people saw the opportunity and were able to save their pants.
You most probably could have laid odds on the number of deaths by Covid-1984 and made a bit or lost on the numbers game. If you had laid a bet on the likelihood of all this turning out to be one huge pandemic fraud, I am confidentially told that there would have been at least one big name bookie shop that would have given you very reasonable odds.
Sadly I do not have the facts to provide whether there are any ticket holders for that. However I can reveal that many have been going to the bookies and asking to lay bets on the likelihood that Matt Hancock, Chris Whitty, Patrick Valance and Neil Ferguson would be arrested before July.
To add my name to the list I entered my local Betfair and asked to be given the odds of these Four Horsemen of the Covid Apocalypse being sent down by September. The lady who I laid my enquiry skidded off to ask the manager what odds. I could see his face frown and nod a No.
In spite of the mask rules on offer, not taken by yours truly, of course, I sidled up and asked precisely why there was no trade on this one.
He grinned and admitted – “You gotta be joking, they’re a gonna. Everyone knows they are guilty as hell. We’d have to offer such dismal odds to be worthless.”
I smiled also to hear such truth and admission. I handed him a sticky from the Pandemic Fraud campaign and he nodded and said a huge thanks, as he took it with glee.
Prior to this visit I had purchased some much needed health stuff at Holland and Barrett. The lad behind the counter had admitted he thought it was all dodgy from way back, as I mourned the fact that him and his ilk did not feel brave enough to stand up and show their true colours. He also took a sticky and was grateful for the few minutes of information I poured in his direction. I left certain he would make use of the QR code and web address.
In the space of ten minutes I felt I had illumined several minds, though late, but closet minds opening are minds opening.
I also realised that this is the time that is the most important of all. Our endeavour to release the truth is no more important than right now. There are cracks all over this charade, this lunatic criminality. The harder we impress on others now, the easier the whole boatload will drown.
It is also to note of significance. It has been a mere week (discounting Easter) that the evidence bundle and case has been laid in court for due process to take its place – a week! Yet here we are at the point where the case is to be listed – in other words the summons will be served. For those that know about timing, process and the passage of these things this is supersonic. Some ask why – the answer is that there are far more people who refuse to buy the BS, the propaganda they spew out at us, and their assitance behind the cloak of the judiciary is huge.
The People will win, are winning – so join the People’s Union of Britain and become one of the prosecuting team, automatically!
Full story here – www.thefreedomcycle.com
P.U.B – www.thefreedomcycle.com/pub
That dreaded ten year anniversary of a national census arrives on March 21st 2021 to roars of Hurrah! Hurrah!
Well not exactly. In these times of tyranny and totalitarian overlording, it seems they finally wish to collect as much data as they can before it is too late. Too late for what some may cry. Too late for being uncovered as the the criminal types they are and the criminality their masters are forcing them to implement.
So we thought you ought to have the opportunity to stand up and tell these snoopy busybodies where they can go. This can be done in two ways:
Way One: Throw the census invitation down the toilet
Way Two: To ask them some salient questions before agreeing to comply with their dodgy ways
In this way we own our sovereign right to not be coerced by any authority having absolutely no right over us and secondly, to show a middle finger to such authority that wishes to rip the last vestiges of freedom from us and enchain us into eternal bondage and death.
Just notice how they are drooling for us to complete these tasks on the Spring Equinox – both a glorious day toward the Light and a Luciferian nudge toward the Dark Side
Here is a template you can use to your heart’s content, created by nobody for everyone. Remember always use the name they used to contact you – i.e. The Householder and then the address it arrived at. No more is needed!
Sir Ian Diamond,
alleged National Statistician
PO Box 1020
NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE
Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent
Dear Prof. Sir Ian Diamond,
There has been delivered to this address a letter sent to ‘The Householder’. It seems that someone somewhere believes there is someone of that name residing here, or at least contactable here.
First of all I would like to say that this neither my name nor anyone I am aware of within this property or my address Rolladex.
I am keen however to assist you, as you are asking said Householder to assist you with what you charmingly call “a census”. You also continue your imprecation with an advisory that all those so named as Householder should complete said census on Sunday 21 March 2021.
I imagine that such a profoundly important date, the vernal equinox, must presuppose some sort of magical incantation celebrating the collective harvesting of the people of Britain’s mass data. I will not further try and guess its purpose, as I wish to be of immediate assistance to your search and discovery, in the most expedient way possible.
Yet you follow your very kind ‘ask’ that the Householder’s help is proffered, with an implicit threat of not only a horrendously large fine of £1,000 but also stating that the completion of this “census” carries a legal requirement.
Sir Ian, in my book I have always found that a request followed immediately by a threat, is mostly found to emanate from the criminal fraternity, rather than from the pen of an alleged statistician, despite him working on behalf of an arm of an increasingly proven criminal fraudulent regime, calling itself government.
First of all may I say that in spite of attempts the present overlords coercing you to be the ‘hitman’ for this incredibly egregious unlawful attempt at forced entry into the private lives of millions, I would still wish to assist you in whatever way I can. I will therefore attempt to convey this request to said ‘Householder’ in the swiftest manner I am able, even though I have no idea where I might uncover said “householder”. I will, for expediency sake, perhaps call upon my friend M. Hercule Poirot, who in matters of solving unsolvable mysteries, is as you may be aware, an expert: Before I am able to do so, I will require the full material, factual and truthful answers to be presented me, in order to expedite your requests.
It is with that in mind I ask some reasonable, pertinent questions. Once these have been answered fully and factually, I am happy to further divulge on questions pointed at, and in my considered opinion, to be the sole territory of me, myself and I.
The census form in question will be completed and returned subject to receipt of full clarification of the points and questions contained in this notice. This is therefore a conditional agreement. This removes controversy and means that you no longer have any ultimate recourse to a court of law in this matter because there is no controversy upon which it could adjudicate.
For this reason, it is important that you consider and respond to this notice and respond in substance, which means actually addressing the points raised herein. The ‘nearest official form’ will not suffice, and consequently is likely to be ignored without dishonour.
Notice to one is notice to all should you not be in a position to respond with clarity to the points stated herein, a suitable officer or official must be delegated to fulfil these requirements.
On the other hand, there is a time limit on the agreement being offered. It is reasonable, and if it runs out, then you and all associated parties are in default, removing any and all lawful excuse on your part for proceeding in this matter.
You have apparently made demands upon ‘The Householder’. Those demands are not understood and cannot therefore be lawfully fulfilled. Clarification of your document is therefore required so that I or ‘The Householder’ may act accordingly. Failure to accept this offer to clarify and to do so completely and in good faith within 7 (seven) days will be deemed by all parties to mean you and your principle or other parties abandon all demands upon me and ‘The Householder’.
Please answer and clarify the following points and questions in full, with proof of all claims made:
- What law requires me to complete the census?
- From where does the Office for National Statistics derive the lawful authority to demand private information?
- Is there a limit to invasion of privacy?
- Is the Office for National Statistics lawfully authorised to demand Private property?
- How can we lawfully be penalised for failure to provide information?
- By what authority does the census collector threaten penalties for failure to provide personal information?
- Are there any circumstances whereby security agencies may access census information as suggested by section 39 subsection four of these statistics and registration services Act 2007?
- Since census data is being requested under pain of law enforcement and threat of financial hardship, are people able to decline answering, so as not to risk incriminating themselves, as authorised, for example, by the Data Protection Act?
- Because government search and seizure of private information is prohibited without a court warrant based on probable cause, current census policies violate that right, do they not?
- As the public have not been consulted on the consensus, please explain how this demand for private information is ‘democratic’.
- Please confirm or deny that any demand through correspondence such as the census form sent to ‘The Householder’, has any basis for legal status or legitimacy.
- The census form states, “the householder is responsible for ensuring that this questionnaire is completed and returned” – please provide details of the legal definition upon which the ONS depends in defining “the householder”.
- Does the census refer to the “sentient, physical, living man / woman or the “Legal Fiction/Person”, as identified by the birth certificates, passports, and other legal documents which have no legal bearing on this sentient, physical, living man / woman?
- Does the Office for National Statistics expect the sentient living man / woman to complete this census on behalf of the human being themselves or on behalf of the various paper documents, known as the Legal Fiction/Person, which they represent?
- Please provide proof of claim that I am a member of the society whose statutes and subsisting regulations you are enforcing.
- Please provide proof and legality whereby the ONS or any of its agents or so-called superior interests are lawfully allowed to encroach upon, demand and make threats to, not only a Private/Family Trust and all that fall under such Trust, but the sacred autonomy and privacy of said Trust granted under international law via the Universal Community Trust Treaty.
- Please provide proof of claim that there is a nameable SoC that I belong to, and that the laws covered within any alleged transgressions state that they apply to me within that named Society.
- Please confirm or deny that the census data will not be used directly or indirectly for the services of shareholders in any of the corporations involved in the running of Government Services.
- Please confirm or deny that the provided information will be used to form profit making strategies and policies that will affect well-being.
- Since every government database has been hacked, leaked, lost or compromised in some fashion, how exactly can the Office for National Statistics claim data security and protection of the information with confidence?
- Does the Office for National Statistics take full responsibility for any mishandled or mis-processed data, or loss of data, or unauthorised accessing of that data by third parties?
- How would the office for National Statistics locate, protect and compensate those individuals whose data becomes compromised?
- What evidence do you have that I am a United Kingdom resident?
- Please confirm or deny that the spiralling cost estimate of almost £650 million spent at a time of national bankruptcy is considered by the ONS to be wholly justifiable and appropriate.
- Please confirm or deny that the expenditure of tens of millions of pounds of taxpayers’ money in order to advertise the census is wholly appropriate and necessary at a time of national bankruptcy.
- Please confirm or deny that the census data will be handled by an offshoot of an American arms manufacturer Lockheed Martin, Lockheed Martin UK and SERCO, a widely known partner of Lockheed Martin.
- Please confirm or deny that Lockheed Martin have in the past been charged with illegally spying on UK citizens.
- Please confirm or deny that Lockheed Martin works with the CIA and FBI and that they have a lengthy record of crimes against humanity.
- Please confirm or deny that while it may be illegal for UK intelligence agencies to spy on the population without a warrant, that it is not illegal for US intelligence services to spy on the UK population with such a warrant.
- Given their track record for such actions please confirm or deny that Lockheed Martin have not in the case of the census consultancy paid bribes to individuals in order to secure the contract estimated at hundred of millions of pounds.
- It is suggested that Lockheed Martin have no moral fibre social conscience or scruples and it is further suggested that they are one of the most disreputable companies in the world – please confirm or deny this.
- It is suggested that thousands of lawsuits have been filed against Lockheed Martin for everything from racial discrimination to fraud. If this were the case, it would prevent them or any partners from fulfilling their contract with the ONS – please confirm or deny this.
- It is reported that Lockheed Martin have lobbied for the illegal war in Iraq and that they have been the main arms suppliers to the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq and Palestine, thus making them responsible for the death of millions of human beings – please confirm or deny this.
- Please confirm or deny that personal details collected in your census will be processed in a plant run by an American firm, staff of which were prosecuted for stealing the student loans records of US President Obama, among other incriminations.
- Please confirm or deny that the personal data collected by your census will not be sold, given, loaned or in any other way disseminated to companies offering online “directory” services such as 192.com or hard copy-based or online directory services such as Yellow Pages or Thomson local, or any similar or associated organisations.
- Please confirm or deny that all US companies are subject to the Patriot Act which allows the US government full access to any data in that company’s possession.
- It is claimed that only staff who work for the ONS will have access to the “full census data set”; please confirm or deny that it would not be possible for several members of ONS staff (each having access to separate data sets) to collude in order to collect together a full data set of information in contravention to the security measures supposedly put in place.
- Please confirm or deny that the statistics and registration services Act 2007 section 39 subsection four would allow disclosure of personal information to any and or all of the following:
a) The 56 geographical and eight non-geographical UK police forces and in particular the Devon and Cornwall Police who are currently owned by the Corporation known as International Business Machines (IBM).
b) The three UK intelligence agencies (MI5, MI6 and GC HQ).
c) The Department for Works and Pensions.
d) Private investigators working for the Department for Work and Pensions to hunt down alleged benefit cheats?
e) Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs tax investigators.
f) “Approved” insurance industry and “anti-fraud” investigators/private investigators.
g) The Home Office Border and Immigration Agency.
h) The Serious Organised Crime Agency (either for domestic investigations into serious crimes, or for these and also for minor investigations if requested by a foreign law enforcement agency under the mutual legal assistance treaties).
i) Lawyers in civil court cases e.g. for divorce, libel or copyright infringement etc.
j) Local authority trading standards departments.
k) Local authority environmental health departments.In relation to the notice on the front of the household questionnaire which reads “Your response is required by law”. Please provide details of which laws apply to the protection of personal information and your assurances that ‘your answers will be kept confidential’.
39. In relation to the notice on the front of the household questionnaire which reads “Your response is required by law”. Please provide details of which laws apply to the protection of personal information and your assurances that ‘your answers will be kept confidential’.
40. Can you confirm that “census information is kept confidential for 100 years. This would mean that when we send you information with all inputted information electronically to the address, they are securely stored and will remain unexamined by anyone for 100 years. Is this offer to contract not fraudulent and therefore null and void?
41. Please confirm the method by which the paper and electronic capture will be handled following the said capture of the information into electronic form.
a) If the paper and electronic information is to be stored please confirm under what circumstances storage will be carried out;
b) if the paper and electronic information is to be recycled, please confirm under which circumstances recycling will be carried out;
c) confirm or deny whether the physical form will be kept as security, as you say the ONS intends to keep the electronic data.
42. Please confirm or deny that the census form constitutes a contract.
43. Given that individuals have been criminalised under UK terrorism legislation for causing information to be brought together, by being accused that by compiling such information (even if it be in the public domain), they are assisting potential terrorists – please confirm or deny that by providing information via the census form or electronically online, I will not be providing information to a foreign power who might have access to that data and so gain an advantage over this sovereign nation.
44. Given the ONS has confirmed that the census will go ahead despite the COVID-19 pandemic, in part because the information obtained will assist government and public understanding of the pandemic’s impact, please supply all material proof of such a pandemic to exist and all evidence and proof of existence of not only a virus existing but Covid-19’s existence, thus supporting claims for the necessity for questions asked in the 2021 census.
45. In order to maintain equality under law, please provide to me the exact same information required from me pertaining to each and every individual who has, is or ever will handle the census information in whatever possible form.
46. Given the premise that “time is money”, please provide documented proof under what authority the census must be completed in my own private time and at my own expense.
47. Please provide documented proof that I cannot charge a fee in advance for the provision of my time and personal information for the purposes of the census. Failure to do so will result in an invoice being issued which must be settled in advance prior to the completion of the census.
Please provide your response in the form of a “statement of truth”, sworn under penalty of perjury and upon your full commercial liability within (7) seven consecutive days of receipt of this notice. If your “full” response conforming to the above criteria is not received, within this appointed time it will be deemed a tacit agreement by virtue of your acquiescence that this census is unlawful and that there is no obligation to participate either as a Common Law sentient being or as the representative for the legal fiction identity and any further correspondence or communication on this matter must cease immediately.
With reference to section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970 and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, any attempt to contact me or “THE HOUSEHOLDER” regarding this matter after the appointed time will be in breach of these acts and will render you guilty of harassment and blackmail which may result in you being reported to the relevant bodies.
Please also note that by attempting to contact me or “the Householder” by telephone regarding this matter after the appointed time, you will also be in breach of the Wireless Telegraph Act 1949, which may result in you being reported to both Trading Standards and the Office of Fair Trading and may also constitute a criminal offence under section 127 of the Communications Act 2003.
Finally, you do not, nor have you ever had, my permission to use or process my personal data in anyway, and so pursuant to the Data Protection Act in 1998, I hereby demand that you cease use of any and all data with regard to me or ‘THE HOUSEHOLDER’, and that you immediately destroy all of my data held on your records. Failure to do so will result in a report being submitted to the Information Commissioner for data protection breaches.
This census form has been respectfully returned or refused to be filled in. Please reissue if or when all of the above points and questions have been addressed in full and all the required conditions have been met.
Sincerely without malice, ill will, vexation or frivolity.
Without any admission of any liability whatsoever, and with all natural inalienable, rights reserved.
Errors and omissions accepted.
Copies of this notice of conditional acceptance have also been sent to: (by Royal Mail)
Census Customer Services,
FREEPOST 2021 Census,
OLD HAG BROUGHT OUT FOR SYMPATHY HIKE
A once-royal deposed pensioner makes dramatic plea on Zoom to aid and abet inveterate liar group as farce and fraudulent mass murder racket continues.Tweet
Masonic and Illuminati aids to the old woman prompted her to stay on message, when her plea for leniency over charges her husband and she were accused of, arising from their son’s exposé in low life activities, were leaked off mic.
Back on message, her mumbled plea, over a Zoom call with sycophantic, so called health professionals, urged the country to think of all those zombies queuing for their first of several toxic jabs.
In a voice reminiscent of so many media psyop emotional pleas, to turn a nation-wide “Ahhh!” into full blooded support, her volume was turned up, emulating command and control in top gear:
“It is obviously difficult for people if they have never had a vaccine, because they ought to think about other people than themselves”
She went on to remark:
“It is not only here we have got the virus, but it is everywhere. It is a strange battle that everybody is fighting…”
Her compliant fellow Zoomers were keen to support her well scripted remarks and make many feel that what was proposed was as legit as it gets. She was then prompted to urge the nation, in some sort of out of place festive season speech to ‘Go for Jab, as your country expects no less of all of you than to comply to our plan‘. She was then prompted to say:
“It is remarkable how quickly the whole thing has, has been done, and so many people have had the vaccine already. So you have to keep up the good work.”
The habitual playbook of dragging out old queens to support present propaganda, is in many ways illustrative of the despair and frustration the present regime faces in not impressing the general public of its aims and true objectives.
Meanwhile, in the sleepy compliant West Country county of Somerset, MP William Rees Mogg, returning, according to anonymous sources, from a family holiday home in distant lands, denied any them and us approach to this ongoing deadly farce. Caught laid back on a far away beach, Rees Mogg, approached by a pre ordained and vetted ‘journalist’ asking sycophantic question of meaningless import, refused to comment. His parliamentary office, on the utterly meaningless interview, met inquiries with rage and accusations of unpatriotic support for a regime that is doing its best to slaughter the majority, under cover of supporting a totally unsupported NHS, due for privatisation later this year. The ongoing house arrest of the country was impressed to be unprecedentedly essential, unlike the travels of Rees Mogg and many other MPs, who, unlike the general populace, feel they have every right to ‘do their own thing’.
Several vox pop interviews now circulating on the Cesspool, otherwise known as social media, show that compliance has risen exponentially to the twin extensions of the lurgy, somnolence and couldn’t-give-a-fuckery. Both are seen to be spreading like wildfire, throughout the land, to the detriment of both sides to the argument.
In summary the old lady gets the last word and is quoted as saying:
“The jab didn’t hurt at all”
The jury is now out as to whether she received an authentic jab of the toxic compound at all. The ‘couldn’t-give-a-fuckery’ crowd are presently busily involved in making left of centre moves to influence the jury’s decision.
We await further advances in this dangerous but riveting game.
This is how we take them down
In the short history of social media, what started out as global interactive fora connecting us all through ‘friendships’, tweets and other mechanisms, has turned itself into a global censorship platform where only OfficialSpeak is condoned and promoted. Not part of the official narrative? – then “You’re banned!”
Without going into the depth of control and real time strangulation of not only decent debate but also any alternative views wishing to discuss, as most people like to do in any open and free society, the point has well and truly arrived at, where the terror of the truth being widely recognised is so great as to ban everything, mock everything and disrupt everything that is truth, threatening to become the reality. We are travelling at lightning speed into a dystopia no one wanted, some might say we are already deep within it, which would be hard to disagree with. So many so ignorant of what is happening. The rest too self centred and ill informed to even care.
Extinction is born out of this, and rightly so. However there are many who would dearly love to arrest this nihilist, blind adherent journey into night.
So confronting the poster boy of the greater plan – Covid-1984 – let us ask a few reasonable and apposite questions that frankly need to be answered before we can all wholeheartedly march in lockstep towards our oblivion.These reasonable questions must be asked before any semi intelligent person concedes to operate under any authority’s diktats. Of course many recognise that the authorities imposing these diktats, are themselves the very epitome of illegal and unlawful imposition. Let us for now put that to one side and simply ask these questions. These questions must by necessity be answered fully, factually and with material evidence, otherwise there is no reason or just cause to ban people from asking such normal questions, unless of course the agenda is to avoid, strike down and ban free speech and cognitive initiative. I shall leave to reader to decide that outcome:
Here are some of them:
- 1. Evidence that masks prevent infection.
- 2. Evidence that masks don’t cause oxygen deprivation which can lead to seizures.
- 3. Evidence that breathing in your own carbon dioxide does not cause bacterial infections and respiratory disorders.
- 4. Evidence that wearing masks does not cause stress and anxiety.
- 5. Evidence that wearing masks prevented the spread of the Spanish Flu.
- 6. Evidence that dismissal for not wearing a mask at work would not represent a material breach of the Equality Act, which entitles someone to claim compensation for discrimination, as well as unfair dismissal.
- 7. Evidence that the government lurgy has ever been proven to exist.
- 8. Evidence that the Coronavirus Act and the regulations which arose out of it are not adjudged to be repugnant and void under the common law.
- 9. Evidence that it is not a crime ancillary to genocide to collaborate with government policy, which has already resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths in care homes and hospitals.
- 10. Evidence that the government has not relied upon fraudulent data to frighten the population into fearful compliance with its legally unenforceable diktats.
- 11. Evidence that vaccines are 100% safe to administer.
- 12. Evidence that vaccines do not have any detrimental health effects, amongst which are, but not limited to, neurological, physical impairment, paralysis, long lasting and detrimental side effects and/or death.
- 13. Evidence that vaccines have been thoroughly tested according to the full rigours of historic testing procedures (usually lasting years) and do not fall short in any respect, of these essential processes .
- 14. Evidence that vaccines have been able to halt /prevent the conditions they are allegedly created for.
- 15. Evidence that keeping a safe distance(6ft/2m) apart is foolproof in stopping spread of infection from alleged Covid-19
- 16. Evidence that a crowd of 2 people gathering is safer than a crowd of 3 or more people gathering in terms of preventing spread of an alleged pandemic Covid.
- 17. Evidence that interacting with people in public and/or open spaces causes a health threat .
If anyone finds these questions and similar are a step too far or out of order then surely the nature of freedom of speech, holding alleged authority to the fire, wishing to have absolute evidence before commitment, is now against the best processes of life. That it is against the law can be mooted, yet the response must be against what law. Most likely responses to that are in the vein –
“Do not challenge what we say – just do it! What we say you must do” – which of course we all know is the mark of totalitarian authority.
QED – Zero Freedom!!
If, as with what they constantly bombard us, the very questioning of their almighty BS is a public health hazard, then surely we are dealing with utter nutcases, professional psychopaths, authoritarian followers and mere puppets of even greater species of the same. By that token alone every single member of the public ought to be rising up and saying a huge NO!
Sadly we have the majority of our country who have rolled over, unquestioning to these masters of lies, propaganda and mind control. If we were to recoil several decades and place this position into an invasion by the Nazis successfully taken, then we should see the very sinew of the population rolling over and creating a British Vichy. Most people will not know what the heck I refer to as all of that has been either expunged or not told to present generations. Their Me! Me! Me! desires have all been met. They give not one flying one for anybody but themselves. Their parents have, in the majority, had few decent critical brain cells to hand down, so we surely are dealing with a manifest pen of sheep.
Even so, against the odds, the minority always win through, so asking these reasonably presented questions is paramount.
The upside of all this is that it is these very questions that can be targeted, not only to those who try to impose governance on us but also to every single head of every single entity that colludes with the lies that the questions expose. It is for each and everyone of us who cherish truth, wish to retain the freedoms we believe and acknowledge are our natural given right. The payback is in what results from this exercise and that down the line is the extinction of those that follow the losers.
Every single supermarket, shop and trading establishment, every single employer who demands you obey, every single law enforcer, bully boy who demands you do this and that. Every single fine you may receive. Every single diktat coming from wherever needs facing off, lettering with the Letter Protocols we have for just this. Every travel quisling, every airline, every airport, port authority imposing whatever. Every pub that goes along every restaurant, every eatery, every one who says – DO IT BECAUSE YOU HAVE BEEN TOLD TO.
No one, not even Social Media, will ever crush the voice of the people. Best way is to withdraw all support from these cancerous organs, yet the will of many is so weak and insecure it relates drawing off/leaving any social medium, as running from friends. Therein is the rub, the utter abrogation of taking personal 100% responsibility and action, the sheer intellectual inability to separate virtual from reality.
Still, all this we know. What those that continue to inflict on us do not know is the power of the pen over their overarching totalitarianism they wish to lock us down into. Pens as swords to the ready and let us launch an attack like they never have witnessed.
**PLEASE SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON EVERY SOCIAL MEDIUM YOU HAVE, SO AS TO SEE HOW THEY TREAT THESE QUESTIONS. WHEN ON A WAR FOOTING WE HAVE TO CHALLENGE IN EVERY WAY. THIS IS DIRECT CHALLENGE FOR A CONVERSATION AND FOR THE DEPTH OF CENSORSHIP WE MAY ENCOUNTER! TEASE ‘EM, TICKLE ‘EM AND ULTIMATELY DEFEAT THEM**
About the Author
Jonathan L. Trapman
Author and photographer writing since age 9, photographing since age 10. A professional career as photojournalist, working for top titles in Fleet Street (London Times, Daily Express and very short, boring stint with the Sun newspaper) swiftly exposes him to propaganda and half truths demanded from photo/journalists of the ‘70s and 80s.
Deciding his soul to be worth more than shekels earned from the news rooms of corporate cronyism, went on to become one of the industry’s foremost photographers. Enjoyed getting to know the world, its peoples and a far wider vision of life on earth on others’ behalf and at others’ expense. Appeared on TV and radio including BBC, France Inter and online radio.
Invited to speak at creative and literary conferences across the globe having in early 2012, in partnership with his wife, accomplished the first ever English translation, in over 900 years, of 11th century Sufi founder and mystic saint Hoja Ahmed Yassawi’s Diwani Hikmet (Divine Wisdom) poetry and sacred verse. Currently working on a 7 volume opus The Freedom Cycle, Dreams and Realities being the first, now published. www.thefreedomcycle.com
The Freedom Cycle is also the info hub for the People’s Union of Britain’s private criminal prosecutions against the array of main players in the present criminal farce.
Views expressed by Guest Authors are their own, and are not reflective of HLN or its editorial team. HLN publishes these for research and educational purposes only. The text is presented for these reasons alone, and absolutely not for purposes related to promoting any of the views expressed herein
DO YOU HONESTLY WANT CHANGE? ARE YOU DONE WITH PROTESTING YOUR SMALL CORNER TO FOCUS ON THE MAIN EVENT?
As a biker I always loved the Steve McQueen character in the film The Great Escape, jumping to freedom over the fence. What also resonated was the spirit of never allowing the bastards get you down. Defiance leading to escape from imprisonment. Each element had its vital role. There were no leaders yet several kinetic strategists.
Yet here we, the majority, conforming to every crass, illegal and fraudulent diktat from regimes set upon us to silence any debate, let alone any questioning.
Many of the rest are liking comments, up-thumbing armchair warriors and following delusional passionates who are endeavouring to make the same old, same old work miracles.
So many little efforts to tinkle within a system, while talking up the great game of escape, with not one jot of real wins. Those who believe they live in a democracy, where petitioning the criminals for easement of their imprisonment terms is a way through, are farting in the wind. Unbelievably ignorant of the futility with which they implore their lying governments to go easy, they continue their fruitless quest.
Then there are those that take hold of their pet cause and wave it about as some sort of solution, a key to escape. Yet what they are asking for is that their little island of freedom be incorporated into the overall prison persecution plan laid out for them, believing that is change.
All this is attempted before even the disparate groups of controlled opposition are spread liberally round good folk desperate for change. Agents provocateurs liberally scattered within well meaning causes create efforts that end up going nowhere.
“You are in prison. If you wish to get out of prison, the first thing you must do is realize that you are in prison. If you think you are free, you can’t escape.”
People have to ask themselves, having attended mass rallies with good intention and been beaten back, controlled as easy as it is to herd sheep into the pen, what is being achieved?
There is a movement to awaken people, yet easily introduced is the ‘woke’ principle. This crass attempt to be awake and aware of the present dystopia is merely the controllers throwing a fetid bone for all to fight over. Such nonsense may look like a brilliant crack of light in the darkness of despair to those too young and ill informed as to the ways of propaganda and mind control, yet to those of us who have lived through previous attempts at divide and conquer, it is merely more of the same.
Yes there has been abuse through all sorts of racism and divide and rule methodology. Yet making BLM (utterly controlled opposition), gender based stuff, etc the basis for ‘my rights’, is as short sighted as it comes. Human sovereign rights endow all these sub sections with their own validity. It is the overarching total that includes, corrects and establishes every sovereign being to be their own being. To believe any one matters more than another is a pup of a lie you have been sold. To engage and expect that “your “ freedoms will be engaged while still tolerating the present tyranny is madness and ignorance itself.
The level of expert insight and leadership is transparently thin within the change movements. The desire is huge, the will is great, yet real leadership, collective or individual is lacking. Yes, there are the figureheads that pop up, urge action yet have virtually no track record of success. Words, appearance, presentation is all there is. Ego, arrogance and self aggrandisement is all most of these types care for. Talking a good game is nowhere near the real game and its results.
The characters of The Great Escape would have pissed all over these egos and self aggrandised puff balls. Breaking out from a prison containing us all for nearly one thousand years is no quick social media dance. It needs forethought, prescient planning and a mind far sharper that the psychopaths can muster.
In what is transpiring, these events have arisen from some of the following successful results so far gained:
Revoking Consent to Be Governed (2008/9)
Exposure of Banking and Mortgage Fraud ( 2010–2020)
Discharged fraudulent claims against
a) a film sales company
b) a car franchise
c) aa travel agent
d) 2 (two) Utilities companies
e) 3 (three) major credit card companies
f) dozens of debt collection agencies
and legal services companie
g) 5 (five) councils
h) The DVLA
i) The police
k) the Registrar of Births
l) 2 (two) of the cartel’s protected banks
Most of these cases were dealt with under the Common Law. Many more were dealt with as summarily within the cartel’s own Admiralty courts.
So the question has to be asked:
If the many are truly more powerful than the few what the heck are we doing to muster that army of resistance, those troops of freedom, those warriors for justice?
So far all the same old rules of engagement have been to the advantage of the tyranny. That people cannot learn from these errors show the utter lack of leadership. That is a fact otherwise there would have been attention returned from the tyrants.
The only movement having true success now, today, at this precise moment is the one that is set to reestablish the Common Law into its rightful and eternal place as THE LAW OF HUMANKIND. No ifs, no buts, the absolute sovereign reestablishment of sovereign beings as the power.
Any trying to tinker round the edges is wasting precious energy and time, or worse are being knowingly led by the assets of the enemy’s intelligence services. Yes, we are deep in the WW3 and dirt is the name of the game these forces use to smear, besmirch and discredit valiant effort. The ease and unquestioning is a weapon we use on ourselves, delivered by the enemy to self inflict. Critical mindset needs developing not following on social media.
Last Wednesday was a tumultuous moment in our collective history. Not for nearly 1000 years have the people asserted their sovereignty. It was such a moment and with the prosecution of the Cabinet first, then the Parliament, we shall see a new dawn of joy, justice and peace.
It is up to each and everyone seeking these values to make themselves known. To be ready to stand and witness this monumental moment in our lands. Herein we shall declare the breakout, the freedom and the glory that we the 99% are endowed with.
Can you imagine the fury, the upset, the foolishness felt when the maskers and adherents to political tyranny get this dose of truth. When they see those they placed their trust in carted off to be tried for fraud, treason and genocide?
Probably the biggest ‘I Told You So’ moment in history, though it must not be a vengeful moment. We are all better than that. It is a crime to hit someone who takes far longer to educate themselves. The education comes to us all as it comes and when it does it must be celebrated! We are each other’s teachers as well as students. The Common Law is just, it is based on the very tenets of lawfulness.
Therefore do not like this article alone, share it, share the truth far and wide. Enable everyone to be there when the curtain goes up on the new and falls heavily on the old.
I have an intuition this article may rile many, upset others and on the whole get lambasted in the way only social media affords. Yet these words are written with deep commitment to change, a lifetime spent honing the skills and aptitude to take the evil castle down, by stealth as much as in your face face off!
Today at Trafalgar Square there was the expectation of a huge, resounding success on the lines both Paris and Berlin have shown us on previous form.
A certain amount of rallying the troops from the likes of Stand UpX and others alongside the gallant efforts of Louise May Creffield and others, ought to have led to a passionate and success filled day. Yet the overall lack of concerted and command filled regimentation expected of a major war push, barley materialised. The full potential of broadcast, in spite of the usual suspects’ well honed and engineered plans to suffocate wide distribution of today’s event, led to the many 35K attendees being short changed considerably. Of course the individual pumping of passion and after glow will enable many to keep their own particular fires burning for many weeks. That is a great positive, for it is the very individuals’ passion and drive that will and must drive this effort to greater heights.
We were also blessed having RT’s Ruptly News Agency cover the whole day from start to finish in their usual professional way, reaching their huge global audience. We know how successful that was as it attracted a great number of the 77 Brigade’s online warriors to flood that channel with the usual feces of negative propaganda.
Holding an average of 20K plus live watchers of the events, undoubtedly will feed the impetus for growing change and additions to the troops for that change.
The 35K odd that showed up were as eager and expectant as we have come to admire, along the lines of a devoted and eager Glastonbury Festival crowd. A huge sense of purpose, generated from the full spectrum crowd of everyone from children to elders. The oddity of having the police breaking tradition and donning masks, gave a hilarious Johnny Come Lately feel to the affair, as much as adding the sort of Keystone Cops element enjoyed so profusely by our own version at Ealing Studios back in the day.
Their masked appearance highlighted the knee jerk pomposity of our arrogant and self serving leaders, in their daily disdain for the people’s well being. With their back and forth change agendas imposed, chasing eagerly sought for positive result to crown despotic whims and fancies, like some psychotic South American dictator, they chose the police to keep up appearances.
Yet from the outset with a poorly used megaphone the alleged compere and link person Kate Shemirani, spat out her offering in such an incoherent way as to be downright difficult to hear, let alone appreciate. When finally the sound system offered a PA that reached the National Gallery, the profusion of her messages were so many, so intermixed as to add confusion rather than clarity. Of course it would have pushed varying degrees of “Yea, right” in people but that is not, unfortunately, the best way to cohere a huge mass on a course of specific take down. Personally I felt her angry ranting took away from the power of the argument, rather than reinforce a determination to face the wrongdoing. Her delivery and support with all the fist pumping distracted from the excellent messages coming from the likes of Dr Adil, Prof. Cahill and others, whose clarity, calm precision delivered messages hit, like bullets, the hearts of the massed crowd.
Surprisingly, David Icke made a really great effort to raise the crowd to revolt. His delivery was clear, well paced and with the right amount of silence between phrases to make it even more impactful. Ms Shemirani could have taken a few notes on his delivery.
As for the disastrous no show of the video links, supplanted by an excellent audio transmission, swiftly cutting off the great Del BigTree, my thoughts are these. In the organisation it ought to have been transparently obvious that the ‘big guns’ would be aimed at this meeting, thus a contingency to have a plan B and C at least would have seemed to have been an imperative. Yet it seemed that even from the outset the lack of a cohesive organisation was lacking or at best ill prepared. Having myself organised huge undertakings where a lot was at stake, it appeared to the trained eye as somewhat amateurish. I do not mean to hurt people’s sensitivities, nor detract from the positives of the day. All I would say is there needs to be a seriously tightening up and cohesion towards future events, for these failings to be rectified.
Sadly the sacrificial lamb at these meets being Piers Corbyn, as attested in his ‘enth arrest of the year, again, also had him mixed in with the organisation. Sweet mascot of revolt as he is, these rallies, protests and counter measures need the command structure of military precision (without hardware!), rather than the vague, off the cuff creations he and probably others, fiddled with.
As I said at the start, some may find this critique harsh, but frankly we need to be far smarter than the slick opponent we are faced with. This craven, criminal, miniature (compared with the 99%) cabal has a head start on our fight back, yet also suffers from its Achilles heel of arrogance and delusional madness.
Less focus on personal ego and self promotion would make a future event far healthier and by extension, achieve a more solid base to build on. So many attending this rally are intelligent and critically thinking humans, thus that very intelligence needs to be harvested, invested in everything we collectively do going forward.
Change is imperative, yet that change can only come at the price of serious intent, not self plugging grandstanding. We have got them on the run, as was shown with the 44th arrest of our own Piers Corbyn. As he rightly said, when you get into the tens of arrests it merely turns comical.
Comedy is one area we can win hearts and minds and really should be a big gun in our arsenal. Nothing like it for deflating arrogant global agenda driven balloons. It was also sad the police seemed to have kettled any advance into Parliament Square, especially after one wise cracker had locked them into their sheep pens in front of the PM’s Downing Street with a bicycle lock!
The importance of mass dissent and mass No! Not In My Name spectacles is, when well coordinated a powerful engine. Keeping these things as peaceful as possible is imperative, even though the gut says, Slay ’em!
A post mortem from many sides, on the day’s successes and areas where there can be room for improvements, is essential. Coordination is vital, a coherent message running through the whole day needs to be established. Look to the Gilets Jaune, the German approach and other successful methodologies and the effect becomes even greater.
With the momentous signing of the full re-establishment of the Common Law a week earlier, the organisers missed a trick not having that as one truly positive development towards self empowerment and People’s sovereign overthrow of the Parliament and government. That it was merely an after thought made space for at what turned out to be, the non event of Parliament Square later in the day, meant a truly professional delivery to the nation of such a momentous point in history missed its national exposure.
In spite of it being signed on the exact day some 378 years after the start of the English Civil War, it bodes well for a peaceful 21st century change towards a time where peace, evolution, interdependence and a sovereign reinstatement of the People take back its rightful place.
From a veritable display of the most outrageous lies and propaganda the present inept, crass and incompetent inmates of Tory Treason have marched arrogantly towards a horizon, where, by their own description, will herald a sunrise into the new future of independence, freedom and unshackling from the bonds of EU restraint.
As they slobber through the discarded Covid masks of a compliant populace, their dreams of gaining ever more a triumphant profit foothold over the masses swells.
No need the jackboot of yesteryear, they smirk, the people are so easily frightened into submission. The cavalier way in which unelected members in the Cabinet Office throw their weight around, doling out more and more pain, ever confusing story and counter story, around the umbrella known as the Plandemic, is as unedifying a sight as Cameron on a pig.
This country has never in its history had such an inept ship of fools at the helm. That lockdowns, mask mandatories and ever closing mass vaccination loom large in the psyche of the psyched, is cold comfort. Truth be told it heralds frozen minds and sheer terror, not witnessed since the break out at Jurassic Park.
When in March of 2020, a small cabal of plotters got together to plan the coup d’état on the United Kingdom, they had every aspiration to do the full Monty. Little did they realise they were not even as efficient as the Lavender Hill mob. That surprise was in store for them further down the line.
As 77 Brigade came into its fullness, reporting back information emanating from anonymous sources, it offered them hard evidence against not only the Prince Andrew but also his brother and strikingly, of their parents. The unidentified source shared the horrors inflicted, at their pleasure. Relating how the abused had been passed as a ‘gift’ from the elder Trudeau in Canada, through shady groups of the elite and onto royal households.
With this securely in their wallet, a plan was executed.
First, in the European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Act 2020 it was worded to read that Parliament was now the sovereign, with no interference from the Crown and above, the People.
It is recognised that the Parliament of the United Kingdom is sovereign.
Section 38(3) reaffirms this, then goes one legal step further:
Accordingly, nothing in this Act derogates from the sovereignty of the Parliament of the United Kingdom.
This abject act of treachery in ignoring the basics of the Common Law, was further increased when the events of COVID-1984 revealed Parliament was acting with what the constitution deems to be prohibited royal powers.
From which juncture it became increasingly obvious the UK government had ever since purported to exercise national sovereignty in the interests of Bill Gates, GAVI and the WHO, as per the sustainable development Agendas 21 and 30.
Mark Sedwill, a ghostly presence in the corridors of power at Westminster, helped by MP Tobias Ellwood, his contact with MPs House wide, proceeded to initiate the coup’s final points as Head of the UK Security Council Group. This group consists of both GCHQ, the British Security Services, Secret Intelligence Services and the Joint Biosecurity Centre. In his position as Cabinet Secretary in the Cabinet Office, he instructed Integrity Initiative, a pale horseman of psyops, counter-disinformation and media development programme and propaganda, to stun gun the public mind.
As the faux pandemic advanced, with full assistance from the media BBC et al, the public crumbled and fell mostly in line.
The desecration of the last remnants of democracy, scarcely visible, was almost complete. What remained was to lock down, keep out of sight any normalcy of life for the population. Winter would come and with it the final closing of freedoms for the people and the mass vaccination campaigns that would complete the branding of the people for tracking and tracing.
Then came the deposing of the Queen — and neutralising the Crown. A subtle move needed here, in as much as the country did not want to get wind of any coup of the crown. However with valuable information at their fingertips, from anonymous sources, they easily managed to get Her Royal Highness to crumble, on threat of her family’s dirty little secrets being exposed. A deal was struck and off to Windsor Castle with her and the Royal entourage. Buckingham Palace shuttered down, the Queen’s own Regiments skedaddled from the front of house and the RAF Military (Martial Law) placed on point duty. The Royal crest roughly ripped from the Royal Gates, the deposing of the Crown was now complete. Complete also with a cover story protecting the Crown against Covid, as an ageing monarch would otherwise be susceptible to.
Roll forward a few months with lockdown and compliance in full swing. The rabid raft of laws illegally introduced through the back door, weighed even more insult and injury upon a growing, suspicious population. However the numbers were never looking in favour of the Many. Still too many quislings, compliance and ignorant masses.
It was inevitable. The Prime Minister and his cronies became, as always, too cocky. They exceeded their arrogant disregard for the intelligence still alive. Their back and forth orders looked like the comedy act they were — and bad comedy at that. The exposure was at its raw edge. Of course those prancing up and down the land, blissfully unaware they had been sussed years ago, carried on the clowning and abuse of the many.
It was to be an auspicious day on August 22nd 2020, hidden away in a secret location in Britain, where 22 of the most ordinary and upright of Britons came together, voluntarily putting themselves forward and chosen randomly. Accompanied by 22 equally upright Britons acting as witnesses to the event about to take place. A renewed and updated presentation of the Declaration of Rights and the Restoration of the Common Law. It passed unanimously. Its ratification taking place in the days that followed.
What never had been believed possible, confronted a coup collective and their treason. From here they would now be subjected to the law of the People, the Common Law. The treachery, the injury imposed upon the people would now be met by justice of the most just.
In their moment of feeling most powerful, their guard was at its most vulnerable. Years of preparation, way back, as the government crowed its petty glory around the Olympic Stadium of 2012 in East London, now came into its own. Real poverty usurped and thrown out for the profiteering gaggle of corporate friends of those power and their land deals, was slaughtered on the pyre of vanity. The stench of corruption was everywhere. The Opening Ceremony itself, arrogantly presented, in full detail, the disasters to befall a hoodwinked citizenry in 2020. The audacity of their tissue thin hubris was being usurped by an intelligent and well laid plan, well away from the bullshit and lies.
“He will win who, prepared himself, waits to take the enemy unprepared.” — Sun Tzu
The foundations laid back then, now appeared, like some avenging angel to scatter the mockery of deceit, perversions and injury laid upon a population too desensitised and mind controlled to know even the slightest truth of what they were to be impaled upon, if it was to hit them full face.
The journey ahead will not be an easy one. Truth hurts, has its backlash of denial, yet ultimately evil will never succeed. As the wet end of August days roll inevitably on, September and the fall to come look to offer, tentatively, the multi coloured splendour that is its very hallmark.
The taking down of the beast at its core – London – could very swiftly manifest a domino reaction in the fall of empires echoing across the globe. The thrall of centuries smashed asunder. It is then the New Age may herald in the Common Law for all humanity along with justice, peace, harmony and coexistence for all.
The author: Jonathan Trapman
Author, photo journalist, researcher and seeker after truth, Jonathan’s career started in the back stabbing, headline grabbing pavements and offices of Fleet Street, London. Decades of indoctrination into the vile art of propaganda and media, found him reach a pinnacle of renown as one of the top photographers in the industry.
Drawn to expose the untruths and base intentions of the Cabal, he followed former investigative members of his family, in exposing the Dark Side.
Please find out more here